QFR No - 7000828629
Defect Details
NC No. 7000828629
NC Date 29/03/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2DZ08810B
Part Name K0PG FORK BOLT
Supplier Name & Code 100189-SANGKAJ STEEL PVT LTD.
ETL Plant 1136-ETL Suspension Sanand
Defect Details DIMN.U/SIZE.-Grove Dia Over Size
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Critical dimension Groove Under Size i.e. 22.23, 22.29, 22.30 again the spec of 22.45-0.1 Also observed Packing standard failure as well as heavy dent and damage at parts
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 2000
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID maheshmishra@sangkaj.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID steel@sangkaj.com
MD Email ID anirudh.2007@hotmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
0
0
0
2000
2000
4000
Check Qty
0
0
0
2000
2000
4000
NG Qty
0
0
0
0
0
0
 
Scrap 0
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% material we inspect with DVC
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Inward RM - Parting - CNC st - CNC 2nd - Plating - final inspection -Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation CNC
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC cell
Machine / Cell No. 38
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
Methodinsert plunge 2 time in groovefound not okX
ManNew manpowerOld manpower found okO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 50
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 OD oversize observed in KOPG 22.45mm
Why 2 Insert plunge 2 times
Why 3 Standard insert is not available.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Standard insert is not available.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 OD oversize observed in KOPG 22.45mm
Why 2 Skip from inspection
Why 3 Sampling inspection
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Sampling inspection
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Outflow100% material inspect with DVCMahesh Mishra20/04/202221/04/2022Pending
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 100% material inspect with DVC instead of snap gauge.
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 00
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before)
Occurance (After)
Outflow (Before)
Outflow (After)
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant
 
12. Document Review
Documents
Specify Other Document
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity
Reason for submission