QFR No - 7000829982
Defect Details
NC No. 7000829982
NC Date 06/04/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2BY04007B
Part Name CANISTER M/C, IMPREGNATED & COATED
Supplier Name & Code 101032-ASM CASTINGS PRIVATE LIMITED (
ETL Plant 1118-ETL E-92,93 Suspension
Defect Details POWDER COATING NOT OK-POWDER COATING PEEL OFF
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Canister Failed in Adhesion Test at Receipt
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 2000
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo bxvtf0xyugvyhemmx3w43yva.png
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@asmcastings.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID skaul@asmcastings.in
MD Email ID rajiv@asmcastings.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
1200
0
0
1650
1000
3850
Check Qty
10
0
0
1650
1000
2660
NG Qty
0
0
0
1650
0
1650
 
Scrap 10
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Part Checked (10 Nos. each lot for Tape Test) and a chemical added in impregnation process as per M/S Ultraseal`s Recommendation (Sealant & Impregnation Unit Supplier)
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
R.M. Receiving - Casting - Fattling- CNC Machining - SPM Machining- Impregnation - Pin Pressing - Leakage Testing- Dry in Oven - Inspection & PDI - Packing - Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Impregnation
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Impregnation Unit
Machine / Cell No. N/A
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineRa not maintained from Shot Blasting MachineRa Inspection & Cycle Time Verification in Shot Blasting MachineX
ToolImpregnation Unit not working adequatelyRing TestX
MaterialImpregnation Sealant not effectiveImpregnation done at Customer End with Other BrandO
ManOperator not aware about processSkill MatrixX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Tape Test
Check Point at Final Inspection No
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size not detect
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Powder Coating Peel off at customer end
Why 2 bonding of Powder & Part could not be adequate
Why 3 a layer of chemical sealant deposited at surface of part
Why 4 Damaged /Old Mesh Used in Basket (mesh Not Changed Timely)
Why 5 Mesh Changing Freq. Not decided.
Root Cause (Occurance) Mesh Changing Freq. Not decided.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Can Not detected at ASM
Why 2 Powder Coating at Outsource. (Customer /Supplier End)
Why 3
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Powder Coating Out Source (Customer /Supplier)
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceQty. per Basket reduced from 600 nos. to 400 nos. per basket & added in Work Instruction.Lalit Sharma30/07/202230/07/2022Completed
OccuranceAwareness Training Provided to Concerned person for Work Instruction ammedment.Lalit Sharma02/08/202202/08/2022Completed
OccuranceMesh Changing Freq. Added in Control PlanLalit Sharma01/02/2023Completed
OccuranceSealant Grade Changed from PC504 to IM3000 to improve Impregnation Quality.Ultraseal.28/10/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Supervisor Verification for part Qty. in Basket as per W.I.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method as per w.i.
Check Point at Final Inspection No
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 10
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) 01. Check Point not added in Work Instruction for qty per basket. 02. Sealent Grade Change from PC504 to IM3000 (Suggested by Impregnation Supplier)
47_Occurance_Before.png
Occurance (After) Work Instruction Updated for Qty. per Basket
47_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Awareness not evident to concern person for Qty. per basket.
47_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Awareness Training provided to concerned person
47_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant n/a
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document W.I
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 4000
Reason for submission No any Peel Off Reported after Action Taken