QFR No - 7000831106
Defect Details
NC No. 7000831106
NC Date 14/04/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. 550LG06702
Part Name SEAT PIPE-(HMS-30 & HMP-30)
Supplier Name & Code 100538-NARINDER PARKASH AND CO
ETL Plant 1143-ETL Suspension Halol, Vadodara
Defect Details THREADING NOT OK-Half thread and Go gauge not qualified
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Half Thread observed
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 61
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@npcindustries.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID anand@npcindustries.in
MD Email ID ajay@npcindustries.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
10000
0
0
0
0
10000
Check Qty
10000
0
0
0
0
10000
NG Qty
14
0
0
0
0
14
 
Scrap 14
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Segregated all the parts at ETL end.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
1. Raw Material 2.Cutting 3.Multistation Draw 4.Head Formation 5.Rough Grinding 6.Punching 7.CNC Head Turning 8.CNC Boring & Facing 9.Tapping 10.Chemfering-1&2 11.Finish Grinding 12.Final Inspection 13. Cleaning 14.Oiling.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Tapping
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Tapping Machine
Machine / Cell No. NPC/TPM/012
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodChips in threadVerified okO
MethodPre Tapping Bore dia u/sVerified okO
MethodTap Wear OutVerified not okX
MaterialMaterial Hardness less / moreVerified okO
ManOperator negligency at inprocessVerified not okX
MethodMinor Dia u/sVerified okO
MethodDents in threadVerified okO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size Asper plan
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 M8 GO TPG not answering
Why 2 Wearout tapping tool used in process.
Why 3 Operator was less awareness about the tapping tool
Why 4 New operator appointed and training gap observed
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) New operator appointed and training gap observed
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 M8 GO TPG not answering
Why 2 Could not be detected at Final Inspection
Why 3 Skipped in Sampling at Final Inspection
Why 4 Less quantity in our Sampling at Final Inspection
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Less quantity in our Sampling at Final Inspection
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceTPG Inspection to be done after every 60pcs(or 10minutes) by operator.Mr. Paramjeet20/04/2022Completed
OccuranceQuality Alert to be displayed at Work StationMr. Lokesh14/04/2022Completed
OutflowIncrease sampling size at Final inspection.Mr. Gurpreet Singh14/06/2022Completed
OutflowQuality alert to be displayed at final inspection areaMr. Lokesh14/04/2022Completed
OccuranceTraining to be provided to new operator about the process any new station.Mr. Gurpreet18/04/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Increase sampling plan at final inspection
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size increase p
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Operator unaware
54_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) Training to be provided to new operator about the process any new station.
54_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) As per sampling plan.
54_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Increase sampling size at Final inspection.
54_Outflow_After.png
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All similar model
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA
Specify Other Document No.
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity
Reason for submission