QFR No - 7000860787
Defect Details
NC No. 7000860787
NC Date 03/09/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2KH03702B
Part Name REBOUND SPRING B105L
Supplier Name & Code 100185-HELICAL SPRINGS
ETL Plant 1118-ETL E-92,93 Suspension
Defect Details DIMN.U/SIZE.-I/D UNDER AIZE SPE=11.20+0.30OBSER=10.88
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Rebound Spring B105L= I/D UNDER SIZE OBSER=10.88
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 10000
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID Prabhat@helicalsprings.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID awadhwa@helicalsprings.in
MD Email ID ataneja@helicalsprings.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
8000
10000
0
5000
0
23000
Check Qty
8000
0
0
5000
0
13000
NG Qty
2500
0
0
0
0
2500
 
Scrap 2500
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% at lying material at our end at your end.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
R/M->Coiling->SR-1->Grinding->Shot -peening->SR-2->Final Inspection-> Packing-> Despatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Machine
Outsource No
Machine / Cell HTC-80
Machine / Cell No. HTC-80
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManCompetency of operatorverify skill matrix found >3 year exp.O
MethodInadequate gauge usedfound NgX
Materialwire grade wrong usedlog verify found okO
MachineSetting errorPhysically verify found okO
Toolslide bolt was loosephysical verify found not okX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 inner dia at spring body under size
Why 2 Slide displacement unevenness
Why 3 Excess play of slide
Why 4 Slide bolt loose
Why 5 checking frequency of bolt tightening only start of shift
Root Cause (Occurance) Uneven displacement of slide at coiling stage.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Inner dia at spring body under size
Why 2 Gauge was not adequate
Why 3 Only checked the 100% inner dia 10.65~10.85
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Only checked the Inner dia 100% with gauge dim 10.65~10.85 mm
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Occurancebolt tightening frequency revised now we checked the bolt tightening twice in a day.sumer07/09/202206/09/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Both ID checked with assembly gauge.
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Before we checked the bolt tightening once in a day
241_Occurance_Before.png
Occurance (After) Now we checked the bolt tightening twice in a day.
241_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) We used a adequate gauge
241_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) we used assembly gauge .
241_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Bolt tightening frequency Revised for all part
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan
Specify Other Document NO
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 5000
Reason for submission Evidence of Occurrence Countermesure Before & After are same ( Need To Correct ) However No Defective Parts Observed after Action Taken.