QFR No - 7000891160
Defect Details
NC No. 7000891160
NC Date 19/01/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2BG03908B
Part Name BKT POWDER COATED
Supplier Name & Code 101032-ASM CASTINGS PRIVATE LIMITED (
ETL Plant 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension
Defect Details THREADING NOT OK-Threading Not ok
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Ejection pin mark observed on spring resting face. Same causing assembly function not OK.
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 520
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@asmcastings.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID skaul@asmcastings.in
MD Email ID rajiv@asmcastings.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
14000
2500
0
3500
460
20460
Check Qty
14000
2500
0
3500
460
20460
NG Qty
520
0
0
39
0
559
 
Scrap 559
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Segregation & Yellow Marking on Ok Parts
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM Receiving - Die Casting - Fattling - Reamer- Shot Blasting - Drilling & Threading - Final Inspection & PDI - Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Machining
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Machine Shop
Machine / Cell No. SPM-02
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ToolTool Blunt (Life Over)Tool History Card verified & Found OkX
MachineTool Position not ok in machineMachine P.M. Record verified & Found OkX
MaterialR.M. of Insert not okMTC report verified & Found OkX
MethodCleaning of thread not adequate in MachiningAir Application check point not available in control planO
ManSemi Skilled operatorSkill Matrix verified & Found okX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 05 Nos./hr
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Thread not cleaned during machining
Why 2 Thread Clean by Coolent only which is not adequate .
Why 3 No Check point added in control plan for Air Cleaning of thread in machining.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) No Check Point added in Control Plan for Air Cleaning of Thread in Machining.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Thread NG Parts skipped from Final Inspection
Why 2 Inspector Not aware
Why 3 Limit Sample not displayed at Final Inspection area.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Limit Sample Not Displayed at final Inspection area.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceCheck Point added in Control Plan for Air Cleaning in machining.Lalit Sharma01/02/202301/02/2023Completed
OutflowLimit Sample displayed at Final Inspection areaAteev Sharma01/02/202301/02/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details Inspection System is same although Limit sample is displayed .
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Check point not available in control plan for air cleaning
334_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Check Point added in control plan for Air Cleaning
334_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Limit sample not available at final inspection area
334_Outflow_Before.jpeg
Outflow (After) limit sample provided at final inspection area.
334_Outflow_After.jpeg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant SPM Machine
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA
Specify Other Document Q-Alert
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 500
Reason for submission Completed.