QFR No - 7000909710
Defect Details
NC No. 7000909710
NC Date 15/04/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520BD00102
Part Name BOTTOM CAP
Supplier Name & Code 100165-SAPTAGIRI INDUSTRIES
ETL Plant 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension
Defect Details M/CING SHIFT.-Flat Distence 3.5 found not ok(uneven)
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Bottom cap observed with offset punching concern. This is repetitive concern in all models & may leads to fitment NG at end customer end.
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 6000
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@saptagirigroup.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID production@saptagirigroup.in
MD Email ID argandhi@saptagirigroup.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
6000
2000
0
0
7000
15000
Check Qty
6000
2000
0
0
7000
15000
NG Qty
6000
0
0
0
0
6000
 
Scrap 6000
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% material verified by visual inspection at all stages.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM + Sheet sharing + Blanking + Forming + Trimming + OD turning
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Forming
Outsource No
Machine / Cell PS/10
Machine / Cell No. 01
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodNew carbide bush parallelism not verifiedParallelism observed upto 1.0 mmX
ManInspector not aware about the dim 3.5 mmawareness training not provided to concern inspectorX
ManInspector not aware the straight portionNo Q-alert display at work placeX
ToolNew tool inspection not doneNew tool installed without inspectionX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Bottom cap offset punching observed
Why 2 new carbide bush replace with old one(old bush ID observed 28.24 mm against 28.1+0.1 mm
Why 3 Forming at one side
Why 4 As installed new carbide bush, it has observed a tapper up to 1.0mm ( not parallel w.r.t. top.)
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) As installed new carbide bush, it has observed a tapper up to 1.0mm ( not parallel w.r.t. top).
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Offset punch parts detected at the customer end
Why 2 Due to less awareness of the final inspector, defective parts skip from the final inspection
Why 3 No awareness training was provided. No Q-alert display at the final inspection
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) No awareness training was provided. No Q-alert display at the final inspection
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceCarbide bush verified for parallelismMr. Dhirajkumar29/04/202329/04/2023Completed
OccuranceWill made a SOP for carbide bush installationMr. Patel06/05/202306/05/2023Completed
OutflowWhile production first part of the shift will verify by profile projector dailyMr. Dhirajkumar29/04/202329/04/2023Completed
OutflowAwareness training will provide to final inspectorMr. Dhirajkumar29/04/202329/04/2023Completed
OccuranceAt stored all carbide bush will verify for parallelism and other fitment parameter.Mr. Patel06/05/202306/05/2023Completed
OccuranceObserved parallelism up to 1.0mm, It is rework by turning operationMr. Patel06/05/202308/05/2023Completed
OccuranceAfter rework carbide bush verified and observed 0.12mmMr. Patel06/05/202306/05/2023Completed
OutflowQ-alert will display at every concern location( Machine shop, final inspection)Mr. Dhirajkumar29/04/202329/04/2023Completed
OutflowDO the feasibility for special gauge to verify bottom cap profile.Mr. Dhirajkumar06/05/202306/05/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details No any change
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Bush Parallelism not verifying
410_Occurance_Before.pptx
Occurance (After) Bush Parallelism verified
410_Occurance_After.pptx
Outflow (Before) Q-alert and training about uneven surfaces not given
410_Outflow_Before.pptx
Outflow (After) Q-alert and training about uneven surfaces given to concern manpower
410_Outflow_After.pptx
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Press Machine 10
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document SOP
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 10
Reason for submission Corrective action parts submission.