QFR No - 7000910858
Defect Details
NC No. 7000910858
NC Date 22/04/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2DC03102B
Part Name INNER DUST COVER K55G
Supplier Name & Code 100990-JAIRAJ ANCILLARIES PVT LTD
ETL Plant 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension
Defect Details BEND-found bend
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description During receipt inspection parts observed in bend condition?? Assembly fitment not possible.
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 300
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID planthead.aurangabad@jairajgroup.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID vp@jairajgroup.com
MD Email ID rajiv@jairajgroup.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
5600
0
0
3000
0
8600
Check Qty
5600
0
0
3000
0
8600
NG Qty
300
0
0
10
0
310
 
Scrap 310
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
1. 100% inspection done at customer end & from all stages. 2. Defective parts are scrapped - 310 no`s - 27.04.2023
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM Receiving- Inward Inspection- RM Issue- Master batch mixing - Injection molding -Deflashing - Final Inspection - Packing & Labelling - PDI & Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Injection Molding
Outsource No
Machine / Cell IMM
Machine / Cell No. IMM-07
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodProcess parameter sheet not followed as per CPVerified PPS . Found ok as per control planO
ToolTool PM not doneVerified & found okO
MaterialRM Grade is not as per specificationVerified RMTC - Found ok - PPCPO
MethodStacking method In-adequately followedVerified stacking height for IDC 3102 . Observed that 2 bags are more than specified stacking heightX
MachineInjection pressure high/low comparing as per PPSVerified injection pressure & found ok as per PPSO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size -
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Part found bend due to stacking height weight
Why 2 Stacking height is more than defined
Why 3 In-adequate awareness about the stacking height resulting into bend
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) In-adequate awareness about the stacking height resulting into bend
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Bend part not detected during PDI
Why 2 Unable to detect the defect as PDI done on sampling basis only
Why 3
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Unable to detect the defect as PDI done on sampling basis only
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowTo check each & every bag on sampling basis during PDIAmol Jagtap05/05/2023Completed
OccuranceAwareness training about stacking heightSachin Kulkarni05/05/2023Completed
OutflowOPL & Q alert to be displayedSachin Kulkarni05/05/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Check each & every bag on sampling basis during PDI
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size -
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) In-adequate Stacking height
431_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) Proper stacking height
431_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) PDI on sampling plan
431_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Each & every bag checked on sampling basis during PDI
431_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant -
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document -
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 10
Reason for submission Corrective action parts submission.