QFR No - 7000949879
Defect Details
NC No. 7000949879
NC Date 04/10/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520PP01902
Part Name WHEEL CLUTCH FINISHED UPGRADE
Supplier Name & Code 100656-MADHURA DIE CAST PVT.LTD
ETL Plant 1132-ETL K-226/1 TRANSMISSION
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-Tepar M/c 6.+0.5 u/s 4.95~5.95mm
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Tapper Machining -Dimn 6+0.5 mm found 4.95~5.95 mm
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 1650
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID madhuradiecast@gmail.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID madhuradiecast@gmail.com
MD Email ID madhuradiecast@gaikegroup.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
500
0
0
500
500
1500
Check Qty
500
0
0
500
500
1500
NG Qty
2
0
0
1
0
3
 
Scrap 3
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
1.Casting 2.fetling 3. CNC 1st Set-up 4.CNC 2nd Set-up 5.Drilling & Tapping 6.Final Inspection
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
1.Casting 2.fetling 3. CNC 1st Set-up 4.CNC 2nd Set-up 5.Drilling & Tapping 6.Final Inspection
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation CNC 2nd Set-up
Outsource No
Machine / Cell 02
Machine / Cell No. CNC
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MaterialBurr resting on faceVerified & Found okO
ManUnskilled operator was operate machineSkill Matrix verify found OKO
MachineLoader dia is less as compare to part resting areaLoader dia is found not okX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 1:1
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Tapper Machining-Dimn 6+0.5 mm found 4.95~5.95 mm
Why 2 Taper machining Problem on friction face
Why 3 CNC Machine Loader not covering complete resting area of part.
Why 4 Loader dia is less as compare to part resting area
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Loader dia is less as compare to part resting area
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Taper Machining not checking at Final stage.
Why 2 Taper Machining checking not added in final inspection check sheet
Why 3
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Taper Machining checking not added in final inspection check sheet.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Outflow1. Started 100% Visual inspection of taper machining at Final Stage. 2. OPL displayed at Final stage. 3. Quality alert is displayed at Final Stage.Quality Supervisor15/10/202311/10/2023Completed
OccuranceBefore loader dia was 48.0 mm & now increased by 59.0 mm as per part resting area.Production Supervisor15/10/202311/10/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Started 100% Visual inspection of taper machining at Final Stage.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 1:1
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Before loader dia was 48.0 mm
567_Occurance_Before.jfif
Occurance (After) now increased by 59.0 mm as per part resting area.
567_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) Taper Machining checking not added in final inspection check sheet.
567_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) 1. Started 100% Visual inspection of taper machining at Final Stage. 2. OPL displayed at Final stage. 3. Quality alert is displayed at Final Stage.
567_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant CNC
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document OPL,QUALITY ALERT
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 1000
Reason for submission OK