QFR No - 7001010243
Defect Details
NC No. 7001010243
NC Date 01/05/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520KT00102
Part Name ROD BUSH
Supplier Name & Code 100177-SPECIALITY SINTERED PRODUCTS P
ETL Plant 1136-ETL Suspension Sanand
Defect Details PARALITY NOT OK.-Parallelism observed up to 0.150 against
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Parallelism observed 0.150 against specification 0.100 mm.
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 15000
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID kalyan.babar@specialitysintered.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID Datta.gadhave@ssplpune.com
MD Email ID lalit.chaudhari@ssplpune.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
51000
0
0
5000
0
56000
Check Qty
51000
0
0
5000
0
56000
NG Qty
51000
0
0
0
0
51000
 
Scrap 51000
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% inspection done for FG parts available at SSPL END
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM Inspection - Forming - Sintering - Debarring - Steam - Final inspection - Packaging
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Forming
Outsource Yes
Machine / Cell 15F3
Machine / Cell No. 15F3
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
Manunskilled operatorinterviewing operator operator skill observed okX
MaterialWrong grade RM usedverified Raw Materil TC obsered grade is OKX
Materialincorrect resting materialverified resting obsevred less strengthO
Methodincorrect control planverified control plan flange tapper not addressed in control planO
Toolincorrect tool usedverified inccorect tool used detected in first offX
Methodincorrect inspection methodverified inspection method observed ok with V block & dial gaugeX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size IS2500
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Parallelism NG observed up to 0.25 mm against spec 0.1 mm max
Why 2 Parallelism Getting out of spec In Forming Process.
Why 3 In Running Condition Length Taper Generated
Why 4 Punch resting Getting Cracked during running condition
Why 5 less strength of resting
Root Cause (Occurance) less strength of resting
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Parallelism NG observed up to 0.25 mm against spec 0.1 mm max
Why 2 Part Not Detect in Process Inspection
Why 3 Inspector Not Checked Flange Taper.
Why 4 Flange Taper Checkpoint Not Address In Forming Control Plan. .
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Flange Taper Checkpoint Not Address In Forming Control Plan. .
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceCountermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status Occurance New Top Punch Resting Made With Sufficient Straight. (Total Width 50MM) Top Punch Resting Check Point Add In Tool History Card.Mayur Patil16/05/202417/05/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details length inspection method changed flange tapper point added in forming control plan
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size IS2500
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) N-31 material grade used
770_Occurance_Before.xlsx
Occurance (After) N-24 material grade used
770_Occurance_After.xlsx
Outflow (Before) Their was no check point of flange tapper
770_Outflow_Before.jpeg
Outflow (After) Flange tapper check point added in control plan
770_Outflow_After.jpeg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant S2KT model
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP
Specify Other Document NA
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 5
Reason for submission Parallelism found Ok in upcoming fresh Lots .