QFR No - 7001046683
Defect Details
NC No. 7001046683
NC Date 24/08/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520HP00212
Part Name OIL SEAL STOPPER1
Supplier Name & Code 100179-BELLITE SPRINGS PVT.LTD.
ETL Plant 1136-ETL Suspension Sanand
Defect Details DIMETER UNDERSIZE-Dim 13.5 undersize
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Gap observed 12.644 against specification 13.5+1.5 mm
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 30000
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID qc.plant2@bellitespring.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID dayanandkore@bellitesprings.com
MD Email ID harsjeet.bhatt@bellitesprings.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
53900
0
0
20000
0
73900
Check Qty
53900
0
0
20000
0
73900
NG Qty
30000
0
0
0
0
30000
 
Scrap 0
Rework 30000
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Checked the all stock at Bellite end & Segregating the material of circlip at customer end
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM Inspection-Coiling-Stress Relieving-Checking - Packing-Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Coiling
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC-02
Machine / Cell No. CNC-02
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineIncomplete stroke of notching toolChecked & found not okO
MethodInspection frequency not adequateChecked & found not okO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Circlip Gap U/S
Why 2 The notch stroke was not completed.
Why 3 the stroke stopper was loose
Why 4 the bolt was loosened
Why 5 the check nut was missing.
Root Cause (Occurance) the check nut was missing.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Circlip Gap U/S
Why 2 To address the issue of undersized circlips not being identified during the final inspection stage
Why 3 due to sampling-based checks with the digital vernier caliper.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) due to sampling-based checks with the digital vernier caliper.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceNew Check Nut is use and stopper is tightened.Mr. Sujit19/08/202419/08/2024Completed
OccuranceTightening by two check nuts one above the other.Mr. Sujit10/09/202410/09/2024Completed
OutflowWe have started 100% inspection at the final inspection stageMr. Sujit07/09/202407/09/2024Completed
OutflowThe PDI report has been updated to include the use of the gap gaugeMr. Sujit07/09/202407/09/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Change PDIR & Set up approval report
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Previously, only one bolt was used.
1038_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) Now, Tightening by two check nuts one above the other.
1038_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) Previously, we checked the circlip using a vernier caliper during the PDI stage
1038_Outflow_Before.xlsx
Outflow (After) We are now using a gap gauge for checking circlips at the PDI stage
1038_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Applicable for CNC machine.
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA
Specify Other Document Set up approval & PD
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 5
Reason for submission Gap observed 12.644 against specification 13.5+1.5 mm