QFR No - 7001048728
Defect Details
NC No. 7001048728
NC Date 31/08/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520AE00300
Part Name CORE PLATE 3W 4S
Supplier Name & Code 100959-AAR CEE ENGINEERING WORKS UNIT
ETL Plant 1132-ETL K-226/1 TRANSMISSION
Defect Details CRACK-heavy nonfelling , buckling & crack issu
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Major Casting defect observed at lot i.e Non filling ,Casting crack & Casting Bend/Buckling
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 25000
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID qc@aarceeengg.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID planthead.diecasting@aarceeengg.com
MD Email ID vaibhav.arora@aarceeengg.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
25000
15000
20000
0
0
60000
Check Qty
25000
15000
20000
0
0
60000
NG Qty
5000
0
0
0
0
5000
 
Scrap 5000
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% Material segregation with identification
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
1)raw material receipt 2)Storage of Raw Material3)Holding Cum Melting 4) PDC 5) 1st trimming 6) Shot Blasting for burr removing 7)Final Inspection & Packing 8) Stress Relieving 9)Sound Testing10)Shot Blasting 11)Barreling12)2nd Trimming
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation pdc
Outsource No
Machine / Cell hpdc
Machine / Cell No. 8
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
Manlack of experience /trainingNew inspectorX
Methodinsufficient hydraulic fluid flow rateAfter verification hydraulic pressure found dropX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 125
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Non filling in Core Plate
Why 2 Intensification pressure improper
Why 3 hydraulic pressure drop
Why 4 hydraulic valve malfunction
Why 5 insufficient hydraulic fluid flow rate
Root Cause (Occurance) insufficient hydraulic fluid flow rate
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Non filling in Core Plate
Why 2 Improper inspection by final inspectors
Why 3 lack of experience /training
Why 4 New inspector
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Training provide to new operators Limit samples will be displayed for better understand.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Occurance1. Check hydraulic Fluid level and condition on daily basis 2.W.I has been updated for hydraulic oil tank level 3 Training Provided to the Operator . 4 Valve maintenance check point added in pm check list 5 hydraulic level monitoring on daily basisHIMANSHU02/09/202403/09/2024Completed
Outflowstart on job training on daily basis poison test started 100% marking has been Implemented on Outside of the BunchHIMANSHU02/09/202403/09/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details visuals defects checked magnifying glass
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) 1) valve condition not checked before 2)Hydraulic level not monitoring on daily basis
1054_Occurance_Before.xls
Occurance (After) 1. Check hydraulic Fluid level and condition on daily basis 2.W.I has been updated for hydraulic oil tank level 3 Training Provided to the Operator . 4 Valve maintenance check point added in pm check list 5 hydraulic level monitoring on daily basis
1054_Occurance_After.xls
Outflow (Before) LACK OF TRANING
1054_Outflow_Before.xls
Outflow (After) DEFECT awareness training increase & poison test adequate 100% marking has been Implemented on Outside of the Bunch
1054_Outflow_After.xls
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant ,LML REDUCED,K-70,K1&K2
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document traning plan
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 1000
Reason for submission Actions not updated Recurrence of defect phenomenon (No sustenance monitored ) RCA need revisit