QFR No - 7001053895
Defect Details
NC No. 7001053895
NC Date 16/09/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F1LG00902B
Part Name SEAT PIPE -K86A
Supplier Name & Code 100538-NARINDER PARKASH AND CO
ETL Plant 1136-ETL Suspension Sanand
Defect Details LENGTH UNDERSIZE-Short Lenght ,concentricity found NG
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Total length specification 152-0.2 observation 150.51 mm
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 1500
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@npcindustries.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID anand@npcindustries.in
MD Email ID ajay@npcindustries.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
6000
10000
18000
15000
5000
54000
Check Qty
6000
10000
18000
15000
5000
54000
NG Qty
1500
525
0
0
0
2025
 
Scrap 2025
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Segregate all material at both end
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Process Flow Description 1.0 Raw Material 2.0 Cutting 3.0 Drawing 4.0 Head Formation 5.0 Rough Grinding 6.0 Punching 7.0 CNC Head Turning 8.0 CNC Boring & Facing 9.0 Tapping 10.0 Chamfering 11.0 ID Deburring 12.0 Finish Grinding 13.0 Final Inspection 14.0 Cleaning 15.0 Oiling 16.0 Packing &Dispatch.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation CNC Head Turning
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC
Machine / Cell No. CNC-12
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodInstrument /Gauge not CallibratedNo linkage with defect observed.O
ManProcess Operator NegligenceNo linkage with defect observed.O
ManFinal Q-gate Inspector NegligenceNo linkage with defect observed.O
MethodWrong SettingNo linkage with defect observed.O
MaterialWrong material mixedNo linkage with defect observed.O
MethodTool was damageAfter verification we found tooling method was inadequateX
MethodNG parts skipped at final Q-gateVerified found NOT OKX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size As per std
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Total length less & concentricity found NG
Why 2 The CNC machine cut more material than necessary, making the part shorter than the required length.
Why 3 Seatpipes were mispositioned, leading to incorrect length measurement during clamping.
Why 4 metallic chip was stuck in the stopper, increasing the apparent length of the part.
Why 5 The stopper design allowed chips to accumulate and interfere with accurate part positioning.
Root Cause (Occurance) The stopper design allowed chips to accumulate and interfere with accurate part positioning.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Total length less & concentricity found NG
Why 2 Defected part did not detected during inspection.
Why 3 Parts were skipped during the Inspection.
Why 4 The sampling Inspection method followed for Concentricity & Visual Inspection method use for length gauge with the help of flat plat
Why 5 Sampling Quantity was less for concentricity & Visual inspection method was inadequate for total length .
Root Cause (Outflow) Sampling Quantity was less for concentricity & Visual inspection method was inadequate for total length .
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceQ-Alert to be displayed at CNC work stations .Mr. Princ17/09/202416/09/2024Completed
OccuranceTraining to be given for correct part placement.Mr. Harwinder17/09/202416/09/2024Completed
OccuranceThe stopper is designed to be modified to eliminate areas where chips can rest or become stuckMr. Mohinder toti25/09/202423/09/2024Completed
OutflowQ- Alert to be displayed at the final InspectionMr. Princ17/09/202416/09/2024Completed
Outflow100% length inspection to be started with the help of length gauge & Sampling qty doubled for concentricity.Mr. Vinay tiwari19/09/202418/09/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Sampling Qty doubled for concentricity & 100 % length inspection started.
Inspection Method Sp. Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) The stopper design allowed chips to accumulate and interfere with accurate part positioning.
1098_Occurance_Before.jpeg
Occurance (After) The stopper is designed to be modified to eliminate areas where chips can rest or become stuck .
1098_Occurance_After.jpeg
Outflow (Before) Sampling Quantity was less for concentricity & Visual inspection method was inadequate for total length .
1098_Outflow_Before.jpeg
Outflow (After) 100% length inspection to be started with the help of length gauge & Sampling qty doubled for concentricity.
1098_Outflow_After.jpeg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All similar models
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document NO
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 5
Reason for submission Total length specification 152-0.2 observation 150.51 mm