QFR No - 7001067878
Defect Details
NC No. 7001067878
NC Date 25/10/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F1DZ00902B
Part Name FORK BOLT K86A
Supplier Name & Code 100106-SHARP ENGINEERS.
ETL Plant 1136-ETL Suspension Sanand
Defect Details MATERIAL DEFECT-Pitting mark
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Pitting marks (Material defect)
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 1870
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@apw3.co.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID kurund.ma@sharp-engineers.com
MD Email ID urkhandelwal@sharp-engineers.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2600
0
0
1500
0
4100
Check Qty
2600
0
0
1500
0
4100
NG Qty
1870
0
0
1400
0
3270
 
Scrap 0
Rework 3270
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All pipeline material segregated
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM inward-Paring and drilling-CNC setup-OD grinding-Milling-Roliing-Plating-FID-Packing and forwarding
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation RM inwarding
Outsource Yes
Machine / Cell RM supplier
Machine / Cell No. RM supplier
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MaterialMaterial changedMaterial found as per specificationO
Manmanpower changedmanpower deployed as per skill matrixO
MachineOperation missingOD turning operation not doneX
Methodpart not clamp properlypart clamp properlyO
ToolTool Changeno tool changeO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 5 nos
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Pitting Mark
Why 2 Pitting Mark at OD Collar
Why 3 OD turning Operation not done
Why 4 OD turning operation not available in program
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) OD turning operation not available in program
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Pitting Mark
Why 2 Skip From inspection
Why 3 Inspector not aware about defect
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Inspector not aware about defect
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowOnjob Training given to inspectorMr. Omkar Bhange28/10/202428/10/2024Completed
Occurance1)OD turning Operation added in CNC program 2) RM Size increase by 0.05mmMr. Manoj Kadam28/10/202428/10/2024Completed
OutflowOPL displayed st final and machine stageOmkar Bhange26/10/202426/10/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Started 100% inspection at final inspection
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) RM of OD 29.50 +0.1 mm were used for fork bolt K-86
1189_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Now, RM of OD 29.55 +0.1 mm are using for fork bolt K-86
1189_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Inspector were not aware about defect
1189_Outflow_Before.png
Outflow (After) On job training given to the inspector
1189_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All fork bolt
 
12. Document Review
Documents InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document NA
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 5
Reason for submission Material defect -Pitting mark