QFR No - 8000782619
Defect Details
NC No. 8000782619
NC Date 03/04/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2HT52107B
Part Name OUTER SPRING K0PG
Supplier Name & Code 101225-HELICAL SPRINGS
ETL Plant 1136-ETL Suspension Sanand
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-PAINT FAULT I.E. PAINT BURN OBSERVED
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Paint Fault
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 1
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo wqqohlt4d2sjrzmz0ygurfve.jpg
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID arun@helicalsprings.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID shaikhmoin@helicalsprings.in
MD Email ID ataneja@helicalsprings.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2016
4000
0
0
0
6016
Check Qty
2016
4000
0
0
0
6016
NG Qty
1
0
0
0
0
1
 
Scrap 1
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% inspection done at ETL & Warehouse.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM, COILING, Stress Releiving-1, Grinding, Shotpeening, Scragging, ID, Length & E1,E2 Checking , Stress Relieving-2, Surface Finish-Powder Coating (Out Source) KRISHNA COATING, Final Inspection.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Powder Coating
Outsource Yes
Machine / Cell NA
Machine / Cell No. NA
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
Manunskilled OperatorSkill matrix checked found okO
MethodHook profile changeProfile changed hooks not replacedX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 5 Nos
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Paint burn (Touch Mark)
Why 2 Powder removed from spring surface
Why 3 Due to spring touching to other spring during coating
Why 4 Profile change hooks not replaced in few hangers
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Profile change hooks not replaced in few hangers
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Paint burn (Touch Mark)
Why 2 Online inspection done.
Why 3 PDIR done before dispatch but not detected in sampling.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Online inspection done.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowTwo Stage inspection Start I. Online Inspection II. Inspection on tableKrishna Coating07/04/202206/04/2022Completed
OccuranceMonitoring hook condition at loading stageKrishna Coating07/04/202206/04/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 2 Stage inspection Start I. Online Inspection II. Inspection on table
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 5 Nos
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Profile change hooks not replaced in few hangers
43_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Monitoring hook condition at loading stage for avoiding touching during coating
43_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Online Inspection.
43_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Stage inspection Start I. Online Inspection II. Inspection on table
43_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All Powder Coated Part.
 
12. Document Review
Documents
Specify Other Document OPL
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 0
Reason for submission To avoid hook (Spring) distance to be proper what action has been taken??? Training record for operator. Document i.e. Hanger PM and hook inspection sheet on daily bases not attached. 1st and 2nd stage inspection can have two different color making to make sure inspection is performed 100% twice at 2 stages.