QFR No - 8000786759
Defect Details
| NC No. | 8000786759 |
| NC Date | 09/05/2022 |
| NC Submission Date | |
| Part No. | F2BF26416M |
| Part Name | OUTER TUBE BUFF LH K0NA DRUM |
| Supplier Name & Code | 100001-ANANT ENTERPRISES |
| ETL Plant | 1146-ETL Suspension Narasapura |
| Defect Details | THREADING NOT OK-M6 WITH OUT THREAD |
1. Problem Description
| Defect Description | M6 |
| Detection Stage | Inprocess |
| Problem Severity | Fitment |
| NG Quantity | 4 |
| Is Defect Repeatative? | No |
| Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
| Quality Head Email ID | anandkulkarni@anantgroup.co.in |
| Plant Head/CEO Email ID | pramodgosavi@anantgroup.co.in |
| MD Email ID | ashwinjoshi@anantgroup.co.in |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
| Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Qty |
0
|
0
|
0
|
2000
|
0
|
2000
|
| Check Qty |
0
|
0
|
0
|
2000
|
0
|
2000
|
| NG Qty |
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
| Scrap | 1 |
| Rework | 0 |
| Under Deviation | 0 |
| Containment Action |
|---|
| 100 % segregation on inhouse stock & Dot identification on job. |
3. Process Flow
| Process Flow Description |
|---|
| Vmc 1st Setup Op-10 |
4. Process Details
| Process / Operation | Tapping operation |
| Outsource | No |
| Machine / Cell | vmc 1st setup op-10 |
| Machine / Cell No. | vmc 1st setup op-10 |
5. Problem Analysis
| Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
|---|---|---|---|
| Machine | Due to abnormal situation tool broken | visual | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
| Inspection Method | Gauge |
| Other Inspection Method | |
| Check Point at Final Inspection | No |
| Checking Freq. | Sampling |
| Sampling | No |
| Sample Size | 4 |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
| Why 1 | M6 Tapping tool broken |
| Why 2 | Due to abnormal situation in machine process |
| Why 3 | |
| Why 4 | |
| Why 5 | |
| Root Cause (Occurance) | M6 tool broken due to abnormal situation in m/c process. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
| Why 1 | No 100 % inspection for M6 TPG. |
| Why 2 | Checking Frequency On Hourly Basis. |
| Why 3 | No Awareness about this type of defect due to abnormal situation . |
| Why 4 | |
| Why 5 | |
| Root Cause (Outflow) | No 100 % inspection. |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
| Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outflow | Q-alert given to all operators & final inspectors | Bhagyesh khairnar | 04/05/2022 | 04/05/2022 | Completed |
| Occurance | Defect CatLog updated | Bhagyesh khairnar | 04/05/2022 | 04/05/2022 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
| Change In Inspection System | Yes |
| Change Details | Dot identification at M6 lug Area. |
| Inspection Method | Other |
| Other Inspection Method | Visual |
| Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
| Checking Freq. | 100% |
| Sampling | No |
| Sample Size | 100 |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
| Occurance (Before) |
Training record 101_Occurance_Before.pdf |
| Occurance (After) |
Q Alert given to all operators & final inspector 101_Occurance_After.pdf |
| Outflow (Before) |
Identification mark on job 101_Outflow_Before.pdf |
| Outflow (After) |
Defect CatLog 101_Outflow_After.pdf |
11. Horizontal Deployment
| Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
| Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | Kola Disc Bottom Case |
12. Document Review
| Documents | WISOP, InspCheckSheet |
| Specify Other Document | Training record |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
| Reviewed Quantity | |
| Reason for submission |