QFR No - 8000787300
Defect Details
NC No. 8000787300
NC Date 12/05/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520FG07802
Part Name GEAR PRIMARY DRIVEN (JZ)
Supplier Name & Code 100987-FLASH VIVEN MACHINING TECHNOLO
ETL Plant 1132-ETL K-226/1 TRANSMISSION
Defect Details MIX UP OTHER MODEL-MIXUP GEAR 74 TEETH AGAINST 75 TEETH
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description MIX UP OTHER MODEL-MIXUP GEAR 74 TEETH AGAINST 75 TEETH
Detection Stage Customer End
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 7
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID sgn.quality@flashgroup.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID dkj.mfg@flashgroup.in
MD Email ID sv.md@flashgroup.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2000
1000
0
2000
800
5800
Check Qty
2000
1000
0
2000
800
5800
NG Qty
10
0
0
0
0
10
 
Scrap 10
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Check pipeline material with White dot marking on gear Face
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
CNC-Hobbing-HT-Bore Honning-Teeth Honning-Final Inspection-Packing-Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Dispatch
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Dispatch
Machine / Cell No. Dispatch
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodPart Mix upYesX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Mix-up of two parts JE551427 & JZ551400. During Final packaging operation
Why 2 Packing of part no JE551427 & JZ551400 at the same location .
Why 3 Separate location not defined
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Partwise separate location not defined
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Part not capture at Packing area
Why 2 No awareness
Why 3
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) 1. Visual Inspection & Input inspected Parts not identified.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Occurance1.Partwise separation location to be defined to avoided part mix-up.RBP/AD12/05/202212/05/2022Completed
Outflow1. After Inspection identification will be provided (color code) 2. Inspection table separately, similar part inspection are defined different location. 3. OPL & Q alert DisplayedAD10/05/202212/05/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Inspection table separately, similar part inspection are defined different location.
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) 1. Partwise separate location not defined
108_Occurance_Before.xlsx
Occurance (After) 1.Partwise separation location to be defined to avoided part mix-up.
108_Occurance_After.xlsx
Outflow (Before) 1. Visual Inspection & Input inspected Parts not identified.
108_Outflow_Before.xlsx
Outflow (After) 1. After Inspection identification will be provided (color code) 2. Inspection table separately, similar part inspection are defined different location. 3. OPL & Q alert Displayed
108_Outflow_After.xlsx
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant JZ & PF model
 
12. Document Review
Documents ProcessFlowChart, PackingStd
Specify Other Document no
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 5000
Reason for submission ok