QFR No - 8000787718
Defect Details
NC No. 8000787718
NC Date 17/05/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. 550LG06202
Part Name SEAT PIPE -K23A/PRFH-006
Supplier Name & Code 100929-HARSHAD ENGINEERING COMPANY
ETL Plant 1146-ETL Suspension Narasapura
Defect Details HIGHT U/SIZE.-TOTAL LENGTH LESS ISSUE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description KON seat pipe total length less issue
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 4
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo nqppngc1jzrocztqb5vn0rur.xlsx
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID qaharshad@miteshauto.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID qaharshad@miteshauto.com
MD Email ID auto.mitesh@gmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2000
0
0
550
4325
6875
Check Qty
2000
0
0
0
0
2000
NG Qty
4
0
0
0
0
4
 
Scrap 4
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
1. 100 % sorting done at ETL 2. 100 % sorting done for HEC FG & WIP stock with Identification mark on box
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
"10 - Raw Material Annealed and Phosphated "20-A - Cutting & 20-B- Cutting wt. "30-A MOS Application 30 -B Multistation Draw "40-A- Head Formation "40-B Inward/Incoming Inspection "50 - Rough Grinding "60-A CNC Head Turning , Facing. 60-B Facing & Boring 60-C Tapping "70A - Punching "70B- Chamfering "80-A - Finish grinding 80-B Buffing "90-A- De-burr 90-B- Final/Visual Inspection "100-A ID Cleaning Diesel 100-B - Ultrasonic cleaning "110-A- Visual Inspection Q gate 110-B - Rust oil Application "120 - Packing & Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Inspection & Packing
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Packing section
Machine / Cell No. 120
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodMix up while packing processAt Packing station mix part foundX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Model mix up
Why 2 During length process parts mix up
Why 3 Various models Length checking done at same station
Why 4 No any provision
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Various models Length checking done at same station
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Model Mix up
Why 2 Various models Length checking done at same station
Why 3 After length checking process no check point
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) After length checking process no check point
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Occurance1.At Final inspection station separate inspection table with checking length gauge proved 2.100% inspection done for length 3."Q" Gate station added before packing 4.Total box weight done to ensure no mix upAshish M & Pravin Jadhav25/05/202209/08/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 1.At Final inspection station separate inspection table with checking length gauge proved 2.`Q` gate provided to ensure mix up concern 3. Total Box weight mention on each box
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Only One station for checking total length
125_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) Three inspection station provided for total length checking
125_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) No provision for Q Gate
125_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Mix up checking station added ( Q gate)
125_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Final Inspection & packing area total length station
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document Packing WI
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 1000
Reason for submission Reviewed 1000 number no issue found ok