QFR No - 8000788179
Defect Details
NC No. 8000788179
NC Date 20/05/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2DZ07712B
Part Name FORK BOLT J1D Ni-Cr plated
Supplier Name & Code 101263-SINGLA PRECISION SCREWS
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-M38 THREADING NOT OK
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description M38 Threading Not ok- GO gauge not qualify
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 99
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo jq1zd3jwbvlx5fndf34ouof2.pptx
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@singlaprecision.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID quality@singlaprecision.com
MD Email ID aditya@singlaprecision.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2000
2500
0
1000
1500
7000
Check Qty
2000
2500
0
1000
1500
7000
NG Qty
1
1
0
0
0
2
 
Scrap 2
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% sorting done at warehouse and at supplier end 01 Ng piece found.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
1.R.M INSPECTION 2. PART OFF 3. ANEALING 4. PHOSPHATING 5. FORGING 6. HEX BUFFING 7. CNC 1ST 8. CNC 2ND 9. BUFFING 10. SURFACE TREATMENT 11. FINAL INSPECTION 12. PACKING.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation TRANSPORTATION
Outsource No
Machine / Cell WAREHOUSE
Machine / Cell No. 1
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManDURING TRANSPORTATION 1 PIECE FELL DOWN FROM BOX AND THREAD GOT DAMAGEVALIDATEDO
MethodINSPECTION METHOD NOT EFFECTIVEVALIDATED AND FOUND OKX
ToolROLLING DIE WEARVALIDATED AND FOUND OKX
MachineNUT BOLTS MAY LOOSEVALIDATED AND FOUND PROPERLY TIGHTX
MaterialRAW MATERIAL GRADE NOT OKVALIDATED AND FOUND OKX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 50/1200
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 M38 THREAD NOT OK
Why 2 THE PROBLEM OCCURED AT TRANSPORTATION STAGE
Why 3 DURING TRANSPORTATION 1 PIECE FELL DOWN FROM BOX AND THREAD GOT DAMAGE
Why 4 OPERATOR WAS NEW AND PUT THE NG PART ALONG WITH THE OK PART BIN.
Why 5 SO 1 PIECE OF THREAD DAMAGE GOT MIXED WITH FINISHED MATERIAL
Root Cause (Occurance) DURING TRANSPORTATION 1 PIECE FELL DOWN FROM BOX AND THREAD GOT DAMAGE.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 M38 THREAD NOT OK
Why 2 OPERATOR WAS NEW AND NOT AWARE ABOUT THIS DEFECT
Why 3 THIS TYPE OF PROBLEM CAME FIRST TIME SO THE DEFECTED PART SKIPPED FROM INSPECTION
Why 4 SO FINAL INSPECTOR WAS NOT ABLE TO DETECT THE PROBLEM
Why 5 SO NG PART DISPATCHED TO CUSTOMER
Root Cause (Outflow) OPERATOR WAS NEW AND NOT AWARE ABOUT THIS DEFECT.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceWORK INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN TO OPERATOR ABOUT THE DEFECT AND HANDLE THE MATERIAL WITH PROPER CARE.RAJU14/05/202221/05/2022Completed
OutflowWORK INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN TO OPERATOR ABOUT THE DEFECT AND TO CHECK THE MATERIAL WITH GAUGE BEFORE PACKING AND DISPATCH.UMED14/05/202221/05/2022Completed
OccuranceEARLIER THE MATERIAL WAS PACKED IN BOX AND PIECES WERE IN LOOSE POSITION . NOW WE STARTED PACKING THE MATERIAL IN STANDARDS BINS. SO AS TO PREVENT THE MATERIAL FROM DENT AND DAMAGESRAJU13/05/202221/05/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details NO CHANGE
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 50/1200
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) MATERIAL WAS PACKED IN LOOSE POSITION IN BOXES
131_Occurance_Before.jpeg
Occurance (After) STANDARD BINS ARE STARTED FOR PACKING.
131_Occurance_After.jpeg
Outflow (Before) NOT AVAILABLE
131_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) WORK INSTRUCTIONS
131_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant NOT APPLICABLE
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document NO
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission ok