QFR No - 8000788445
Defect Details
NC No. 8000788445
NC Date 23/05/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2GN02302B
Part Name MAIN SPRING-KTEM/KTEL
Supplier Name & Code 101225-HELICAL SPRINGS
ETL Plant 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension
Defect Details MIX UP OTHER MODEL-MIXUP WITH OTHER MODEL
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Other model mix-up concern. This is repetitive concern in other models supplied by M/s Helical Spring.
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 702
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo k45nr4nswe1z3gj1mejw5zia.jpg
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID arun@helicalsprings.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID shaikhmoin@helicalsprings.in
MD Email ID ataneja@helicalsprings.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2794
0
0
2000
0
4794
Check Qty
2794
0
0
2000
0
4794
NG Qty
741
0
0
0
0
741
 
Scrap 0
Rework 741
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Inspection all material at ETL,WH & FG
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Raw Material Receipt & Inspection, Coiling, Stress Relieving, End Grinding, Shot Peening, Scragging, Length & Waviness checking, Strain-aging, Surface Finish- Oiling, Final Inspection/ PDI, Packing, Dispatch.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Final Inspection
Outsource No
Machine / Cell NA
Machine / Cell No. NA
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodImproper Material handlingMaterial handling done as per process verified found not okX
Manunskilled OperatorSkill matrix checked found not okX
MachineMachine check Sheet not followedCLIT verified found OkO
MaterialMaterial GradeRMTC verified found okO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 1000/19
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Other model mix up
Why 2 Similar model springs storage location found at one place
Why 3 Separate location not defined
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Separate location not defined
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Other model mix up
Why 2 Other model spring not detected during PDI inspection
Why 3 PDI done on sampling basis
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) PDI done on sampling basis
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceSeparate Pallets defined for keeping similar modelsMr.Dadasaheb Mhaske01/06/202231/05/2022Completed
OccuranceTraining provides to loading people & store teamMr.Anuj Shelke01/06/202231/05/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details No change
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 1000/19
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Separate location not defined
146_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) Separate Pallets defined for keeping similar models
146_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) PDI done on sampling basis
146_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) PDI doing on sampling basis. Training provided to loading people & store team to keep similar type of springs on separate pallets
146_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Similar Model springs
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document SOP
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 150
Reason for submission Completed.