QFR No - 8000791480
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000791480 |
NC Date | 15/06/2022 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | S1AB00307B |
Part Name | ADJUSTER POWDER COATED K0LA |
Supplier Name & Code | 100973-ABHIVRDHI ENGINEERING PRIVATE |
ETL Plant | 1136-ETL Suspension Sanand |
Defect Details | POWDER COATING NOT OK-POWDERCOATING PROBLEM |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | Powder Coating defects like paint bubble, paint dry, paint dust etc. and wrong supplier code (found V code instead of A code) |
Detection Stage | Receipt |
Problem Severity | Aesthetic |
NG Quantity | 275 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | No |
Defect Sketch / Photo | 0s4yuyooyw4vtdtqjaz2mq3a.jpg |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | rkhare@tesmomotorcast.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | harish.bala@tesmomotorcast.com |
MD Email ID | svkallani@tesmomotorcast.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
275
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2100
|
2375
|
Check Qty |
275
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2100
|
2375
|
NG Qty |
275
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
275
|
Scrap | 75 |
Rework | 150 |
Under Deviation | 50 |
Containment Action |
---|
After powder coated 100% inspection |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
pdc - ,reming - od grinding, - debering - surface treatment - inspection - powder coated - packing. |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | Powder Coated |
Outsource | Yes |
Machine / Cell | booth 1 |
Machine / Cell No. | 1 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Method | not proper spray | gauge | O |
Method | Pre-Treatment process not done | system | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 1 |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Powder coating not ok |
Why 2 | Powder not uniform on part |
Why 3 | Powder electrostatic gun malfunctioning |
Why 4 | Gun to earth continuity not good |
Why 5 | Continuity pm not check |
Root Cause (Occurance) | point not available in pm check sheet |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | powder coating not ok |
Why 2 | Uncover part in final packing |
Why 3 | 100 % inspection not happen after powder coating |
Why 4 | Sample inspection process follow |
Why 5 | Inspection system not ok |
Root Cause (Outflow) | 100% inspection started |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | Continuity checking from gun to hanger started | Rahul | 06/03/2023 | Completed | |
Outflow | 100 % inspection started | Rahul | 06/03/2023 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | 100% inspection after powder coating |
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Visual |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 1 |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Before powder coated 180_Occurance_Before.jpg |
Occurance (After) |
after powder coated 180_Occurance_After.jpg |
Outflow (Before) |
powder coated check 180_Outflow_Before.jpg |
Outflow (After) |
100% inspection check 180_Outflow_After.jpg |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | adjuster kola |
12. Document Review
Documents | ControlPlan, PackingStd |
Specify Other Document | process flow chart |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | |
Reason for submission |