QFR No - 8000792475
Defect Details
NC No. 8000792475
NC Date 23/06/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2BG00702B
Part Name BRACKET UN P/C
Supplier Name & Code 101032-ASM CASTINGS PRIVATE LIMITED (
ETL Plant 1143-ETL Suspension Halol, Vadodara
Defect Details BUFFING DEFECT-BUFFING MARK,SCRATCH MARK
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Buffing Mark
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 684
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo zkxzdvg4s1fgjqi10txeucfj.jpg
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@asmcastings.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID skaul@asmcastings.in
MD Email ID rajiv@asmcastings.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
0
0
0
2200
1050
3250
Check Qty
0
0
0
2200
1050
3250
NG Qty
0
0
0
69
18
87
 
Scrap 0
Rework 87
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Re-Buffing done on Parts.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Incoming of R.M. - R.M. Melting - Die Casting - Lancering - Reamer - Drilling & Tapping - Buffing - Polishing - Inspection - Packing & PDI- Dispatch.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Buffing
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Machine Shop
Machine / Cell No. Buffing Machine
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManOperator not aware about WorkSkill Matrix to be verified for min. Level 2X
MethodBuffing Wheel Grade not OkPhysical Verification for Appearance by Different Grade Wheel.O
MachineScratch during MachiningPhysical VerificationX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Buffing Marks on Bracket
Why 2 Buffing Wheel Grade Not Adequate (120 No. while required 160 no. for Painted parts)
Why 3 Process Validation not done as per Painted part
Why 4 Paint At Customer End.
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Process Validation not done for Buffing Appearance.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Buffing Marks on Bracket
Why 2 Skipped from Final Inspection
Why 3 Limit Sample not provided for Buffing Marks.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Limit Sample not provided for Buffing Marks.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Occurance01) Process Validation done for Buffing Appearance on painted parts. 02) Buffing Wheel Grade Changed from 120 to 160 no. 03) Control Plan updated for the buffing Wheel Grade.Lalit Sharma15/07/202215/07/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details Visual Inspection as previous
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Buffing Wheel Grade 120 No.
185_Occurance_Before.png
Occurance (After) Buffing Wheel Grade 160 No.
185_Occurance_After.png
Outflow (Before) Limit Sample was not provided
185_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Limit Sample Provided.
185_Outflow_After.jpeg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Buffing Machine
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, WISOP
Specify Other Document Limit Sample
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 500
Reason for submission Found ok and reduce visual defects