QFR No - 8000798536
Defect Details
NC No. 8000798536
NC Date 04/08/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. 3630001833
Part Name M/C HANDLE BAR BODY 3W (24151274) BAJAJ
Supplier Name & Code 100202-G P AUTO COMPONENTS
ETL Plant 1102-ETL L-6 Die Casting
Defect Details TAPPING O/SIZE.-M4 TAPPING OVERSIZE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Speedometer Cover M4 Tapping oversize
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 180
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@advantechgroup.co.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID advantechengg@rediffmail.com
MD Email ID
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
3000
0
0
500
200
3700
Check Qty
3000
0
0
500
200
3700
NG Qty
180
0
0
0
0
180
 
Scrap 180
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% inspection done with Minor diameter pin
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
incoming inspection>OP-10( Face cut & ø 28 hole)>OP-20 ( 21.8Remer) > OP30 ( Speedometer drilling)>OP40( M4 Tapping)> OP50 ( Spot face Outside)> OP-60( Spot Face inside face)>OP70(10.5 reamer)> OP80 (Switch hole RH side drilling)> OP90 ( Switch hole LH side Drilling)> OP100( Switch Hole Tapping)> OP110( Final inspection)
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation OP30 ( Speedometer drilling)
Outsource No
Machine / Cell SPM-03
Machine / Cell No. SPM-03
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodWrong loadingOKO
ManNew man PowerSkilled manpoer- SuirvanshiO
MaterialWrong chemical compositionChemsitry Found okO
MachineSpindle run okRun out observed up to 8 micronO
ToolDrilling tapp damageDrill tap found damageX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 5 part
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 m4 tapping over size( minor diameter not ok)
Why 2 drill hole over size
Why 3 ø3.6 drill burn out
Why 4 unsufficient coolant flow
Why 5 Coolant Flow nozzle jam.
Root Cause (Occurance) Coolant Flow nozzle jam
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 m4 tapping over size( minor diameter not ok)
Why 2 Part Not arrest on stage
Why 3 inspection on sampling base at final inspection table only
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Minor diameter not check during inprocess, only doing at final inspection on sampling base
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceCoolant flow nozzle change & checking frequency added in JH check sheetMr. Suryavanshi20/08/2022Pending
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details minor diameter inspection added in in process & 100% at final stage
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Coolant nozzle jam
223_Occurance_Before.png
Occurance (After) Coolant nozzle cleaned
223_Occurance_After.png
Outflow (Before) Core pin gauge check point not add in Inprocess inspection report
223_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Core pin gauge check point added in Inprocess inspection report
223_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Drilling SPM / Excellent Machine Tool / G P Auto
 
12. Document Review
Documents InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document no
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity
Reason for submission