QFR No - 8000802992
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000802992 |
NC Date | 06/09/2022 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | F2GN20502B |
Part Name | MAIN SPRING |
Supplier Name & Code | 100952-STUMPP SCHUELE AND SOMAPPA SPR |
ETL Plant | 1118-ETL E-92,93 Suspension |
Defect Details | HIGHT O/SIZE.-LINGTH OVER SIZE |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | Free length found over size by 1 MM. |
Detection Stage | Inprocess |
Problem Severity | Function |
NG Quantity | 66 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | No |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | hravikumar@ssssprings.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | sreenivasulu.k@ssssprings.com |
MD Email ID | rln@ssssprings.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
1000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1000
|
Check Qty |
1000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1000
|
NG Qty |
66
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
66
|
Scrap | 66 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
After Receipt a complaint 100 % inspection verified to Free Length |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
Coiling - Tempering-Grinding-Shot Peening - Setting-100% Lo Inspection-2nd Tempering-Final Inspection-Oiling-Packing |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | 100% Lo Inspection |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | FF Cell |
Machine / Cell No. | FF Cell |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Method | Due to Initial Stage Free Length not added into Regular WI | Yes | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Sp. Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 05 |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Due to Initial Stage Free Length not added into Regular WI |
Why 2 | This 100% Length Sorting done on 2 Inspection Stage |
Why 3 | 1of the Operator less aware about this Specification |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Specification not displayed on Regular inspection Table, |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | During Sample basis Inspection done of 1 Operator |
Why 2 | Due to 05 No`s Sample inspection done to only 1 opearotor |
Why 3 | |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Sample inspection done to Only 1 Opearator |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | Initial Stage Free Length will be added into Regular WI | Mr. Ishwar Jadhav | 09/09/2022 | 09/09/2022 | Completed |
Outflow | Sample inspection will be done by QA to each operator | Mr. Shivkumar Fartade | 07/09/2022 | 07/09/2022 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | Sample inspection will be done by QA to each operator |
Inspection Method | Sp. Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 02/E OP. |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Due to Initial Stage Free Length not added into Regular WI 242_Occurance_Before.pdf |
Occurance (After) |
Specification not displayed on Regular inspection Table, 242_Occurance_After.pdf |
Outflow (Before) |
During Sample basis Inspection done of 1 Operator 242_Outflow_Before.jpg |
Outflow (After) |
Sample inspection will be done by QA to each operator 242_Outflow_After.jpg |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | FF Cell |
12. Document Review
Documents | WISOP |
Specify Other Document | NA |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 66 |
Reason for submission | we have checked this lot and found ok. |