QFR No - 8000804715
Defect Details
NC No. 8000804715
NC Date 19/09/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. 165FG01101
Part Name GEAR PRIMARY ASSLY 3W-4S 200 cc LPG
Supplier Name & Code 100237-SANJEEV AUTO PARTS MRFS PVT LT
ETL Plant 1132-ETL K-226/1 TRANSMISSION
Defect Details DIAMETER OVER SIZE-DIA 35.5-0.009/-0.034 OVER SIZE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description DIAMETER FOUND OVER SIZE (DIM 35.5-0.009/-0.034 FOUND UPTO 35.550~35.70 MM)
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 36
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID vpwankhade@sanjeevgroup.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID rmtiwari@sanjeevgroup.com
MD Email ID maithilee@sanjeevgroup.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
500
0
0
0
0
500
Check Qty
500
0
0
0
0
500
NG Qty
10
0
0
0
0
10
 
Scrap 0
Rework 10
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Segregated All parts at ETL end.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM Inward-bar cutting-billet cutting-hot forging-normalizing-shotblasting-coining-preturning-peircing-1peircing-2shaving-1-shaving-2milling-1-milling-2-finish turning 1st setup-finish turning-2set up-deburring--final inspection CNC blanks-Inward inspection cnc blank-tracibility marking-hobbing-teeth chamfering-gear shaving-heat treatment-shotblasting-id turning-bush pressing-bush turning-washing-Final Inspection
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Hard Turning
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC Jobber 03
Machine / Cell No. CNC Jobber 03
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ToolTool Worn OutInsert Worn out as it is Hard Turning Process, Tool Wear Pattern Is High.O
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Why OD Oversize In Part
Why 2 less Material got Removed From Part than expected in process
Why 3 Insert Worn out
Why 4 Insert Life was less than expected
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Insert Life was less that expected
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Why Defectives Skipped From Inspection
Why 2 Material Mixed Up
Why 3 New Manpower deployed
Why 4 Manpower needs training on Rejection Handling
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) New Manpower, needs training on Rejection Handling
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceTool Life monitoring started, Tool Verification by Supervisor StartedSandip Lahane02/10/202202/10/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 100 % Inspection On Air Gauge with Paint Marking for Confirmation.
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) No Tool Life Monitoring
256_Occurance_Before.xlsx
Occurance (After) Tool Life Monitoring Started
256_Occurance_After.xlsx
Outflow (Before) No Tool Inspection Point In Hourly Inspection Report
256_Outflow_Before.xlsx
Outflow (After) HIPR Updated
256_Outflow_After.xlsx
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All Machine, ALL GPH Parts
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, WISOP, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document No
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 1000
Reason for submission POKA-YOKE to be implement at process side (Air Gauge inspection interlocked with Machine cycle)