QFR No - 8000807148
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000807148 |
NC Date | 08/10/2022 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | B35206400O |
Part Name | BRAKE SHOE ASSLY ASK (ASF4) - EMARKING |
Supplier Name & Code | 100822-ASK AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD. ( UNI |
ETL Plant | 1159-ETL E-71 Disc Brakes |
Defect Details | RUNOUT-PERPENDICUALIRITY NOT OK |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | Brake shoe rejected for tapper and run out issue |
Detection Stage | Receipt |
Problem Severity | Function |
NG Quantity | 50 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
Defect Sketch / Photo | 52yu4gaq5goz4pel54r2ct1q.msg |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | bms@askbrake.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | am@askbrake.com |
MD Email ID | pr@askbrake.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
4000
|
0
|
0
|
4000
|
2413
|
10413
|
Check Qty |
4000
|
0
|
0
|
4000
|
2413
|
10413
|
NG Qty |
50
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
50
|
Scrap | 50 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
All material laying at ETL & ASK segregated 100%. |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
Receiving- Machining- Adhesive Application- Clamping - OD Grinding - Final Inspection & Packing |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | Brake Shoe |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | OD Grinding Machine |
Machine / Cell No. | 1202158 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Method | Inspection Frequency | Inproces Inspection frequency of OD grinding is sufficient | O |
Method | Sample Size | Sample inspection size of OD grinding need to improve | X |
Method | OD grinding process | OD grinding process is automated. | X |
Man | New Manpower | No new manpower appointed on OD grinding process | X |
Man | Manpower Skill Level | All manpower have skill level III | X |
Machine | Wheel dressing frequency | Once in a day, which needs improve | O |
Material | Material changed | No change in material | X |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Instrument |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 1set / hr |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Runout observed more |
Why 2 | In second shift found some parts out of specification during inspection |
Why 3 | Wheel dressing frequency less. |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Verified the process with every 50th set after setup and observed that in first shift no NG parts found and in mid of second shift we have found 1 or 2 sets NG for runout. Again we have done setup after wheel dressing and no runout observed in the part. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Runout observed more |
Why 2 | Problem not captured during sampling inspection |
Why 3 | |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Problem not captured during sampling inspection. |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | 1. Wheel dressing frequency increased from once in a day to once in shift. 2. Training given to process engineers and also associates to dress the grinding wheel once in a shift. | Prashant | 12/10/2023 | 12/10/2022 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | No |
Change Details | No Change |
Inspection Method | Instrument |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 2 set / hr |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Work Instruction Before 272_Occurance_Before.pdf |
Occurance (After) |
Work Instruction 272_Occurance_After.pdf |
Outflow (Before) |
Setup & IIR Before 272_Outflow_Before.pdf |
Outflow (After) |
Setup & IIR 272_Outflow_After.pdf |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | All machines |
12. Document Review
Documents | WISOP, InspCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | Setup & IIR |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | |
Reason for submission |