QFR No - 8000807148
Defect Details
NC No. 8000807148
NC Date 08/10/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. B35206400O
Part Name BRAKE SHOE ASSLY ASK (ASF4) - EMARKING
Supplier Name & Code 100822-ASK AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD. ( UNI
ETL Plant 1159-ETL E-71 Disc Brakes
Defect Details RUNOUT-PERPENDICUALIRITY NOT OK
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Brake shoe rejected for tapper and run out issue
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 50
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo 52yu4gaq5goz4pel54r2ct1q.msg
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID bms@askbrake.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID am@askbrake.com
MD Email ID pr@askbrake.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
4000
0
0
4000
2413
10413
Check Qty
4000
0
0
4000
2413
10413
NG Qty
50
0
0
0
0
50
 
Scrap 50
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All material laying at ETL & ASK segregated 100%.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Receiving- Machining- Adhesive Application- Clamping - OD Grinding - Final Inspection & Packing
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Brake Shoe
Outsource No
Machine / Cell OD Grinding Machine
Machine / Cell No. 1202158
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodInspection FrequencyInproces Inspection frequency of OD grinding is sufficientO
MethodSample SizeSample inspection size of OD grinding need to improveX
MethodOD grinding processOD grinding process is automated.X
ManNew ManpowerNo new manpower appointed on OD grinding processX
ManManpower Skill LevelAll manpower have skill level IIIX
MachineWheel dressing frequencyOnce in a day, which needs improveO
MaterialMaterial changedNo change in materialX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 1set / hr
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Runout observed more
Why 2 In second shift found some parts out of specification during inspection
Why 3 Wheel dressing frequency less.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Verified the process with every 50th set after setup and observed that in first shift no NG parts found and in mid of second shift we have found 1 or 2 sets NG for runout. Again we have done setup after wheel dressing and no runout observed in the part.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Runout observed more
Why 2 Problem not captured during sampling inspection
Why 3
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Problem not captured during sampling inspection.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Occurance1. Wheel dressing frequency increased from once in a day to once in shift. 2. Training given to process engineers and also associates to dress the grinding wheel once in a shift.Prashant12/10/202312/10/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details No Change
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 2 set / hr
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Work Instruction Before
272_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Work Instruction
272_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Setup & IIR Before
272_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Setup & IIR
272_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All machines
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document Setup & IIR
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity
Reason for submission