QFR No - 8000808151
Defect Details
NC No. 8000808151
NC Date 17/10/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2BG03908B
Part Name BKT POWDER COATED
Supplier Name & Code 101032-ASM CASTINGS PRIVATE LIMITED (
ETL Plant 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension
Defect Details THREADING NOT OK-THREADING NOT OK
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description KHI Bracket observed with step at ID side concern. This causing assembly fitment (Rubber bush fitment) not OK.
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 553
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@asmcastings.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID skaul@asmcastings.in
MD Email ID rajiv@asmcastings.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2000
1200
0
2800
0
6000
Check Qty
2000
1200
0
2800
0
6000
NG Qty
553
128
0
221
0
902
 
Scrap 902
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% Segregation at customer as well as ASM End.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
R.M. Receiving - Die Casting - Fattling - Bush Fitting Dia Reamer - Drilling & Tapping - Visual Inspection - PDI -Packing - Dispatch - Powder Coating at Tulza Ent. - Dispatch to ETL.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Powder Coating
Outsource Yes
Machine / Cell Die Casting
Machine / Cell No. PDC-01
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MaterialHard Particle in Al Ingot.Chemical CompositionO
MethodReamer not adequateRemer Size CheckedO
ManUn Skilled OperatorSkill MatrixO
ToolPin Bulged in DiePhysical VerificationX
MachinePlay in Machine PlatonPhysical VerificationO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 05 Nos.
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Step Observed in ID
Why 2 Pin Bulged during Mass Production
Why 3 Not Checked in Process Inspection
Why 4 Check Point not added in Inspection td.
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Check point not added in Inspection Std. for Step in I.D.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Step in I.D.
Why 2 Could Not detected during Final Inspection
Why 3 Inspector Not aware about Issue.
Why 4 Check Point not added in Work Instruction.
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Check For Step in I.D. , not added in Work Instruction of Final Inspection.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceCheck Point added for Step In I.D. in Inspection Std. of PDC.Lalit Sharma10/11/2022Completed
OutflowCheck Point added in Work Instruction of Final InspectionLalit Sharma10/11/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Earlier Limit Sample was not there for Compare
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Limit Sample.
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) No Check Point at PDC stage for Step in I.D.
288_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) Check Point added for step in ID at PDC Stage
288_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) No Check Point for Step in I.D. in Work Instruction & No Limit Sample
288_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Check point added in Work Instruction at Final Stage & Limit Sample Provided.
288_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant PDC Machine
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document Limit Sample
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 1000
Reason for submission No any reoccurance.