QFR No - 8000817429
Defect Details
| NC No. | 8000817429 |
| NC Date | 18/01/2023 |
| NC Submission Date | |
| Part No. | F2DZ09002B |
| Part Name | FORK BOLT -K17E |
| Supplier Name & Code | 101263-SINGLA PRECISION SCREWS |
| ETL Plant | 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension |
| Defect Details | NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-M26 GAUGE AND MATING PART NOT QUALIFY |
1. Problem Description
| Defect Description | fork bolt threads not qualify to mating part- threads found damage marks |
| Detection Stage | Inprocess |
| Problem Severity | Fitment |
| NG Quantity | 240 |
| Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
| Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
| Quality Head Email ID | quality@singlaprecision.com |
| Plant Head/CEO Email ID | quality@singlaprecision.com |
| MD Email ID | aditya@singlaprecision.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
| Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Qty |
1600
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1600
|
| Check Qty |
1600
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1600
|
| NG Qty |
810
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
810
|
| Scrap | 0 |
| Rework | 810 |
| Under Deviation | 0 |
| Containment Action |
|---|
| 100 % MATING PART INSPECTION DONE AT ALL THE MATERIAL LYING AT VARIOUS STAGES. |
3. Process Flow
| Process Flow Description |
|---|
| 1. RM 2. PART OFF 3. PUNCHING 4. DRILLING+COUNTER 5. TAPPING 6. CNC TURNING 7. FINAL INSPECTION 8. PACKING AND DISPATCH (ROHTAK TO AURANGABAD) 8. SURFACE TREATMENT 9. FINAL SORTING 10. PACKING AND DISPATCH (WAREHOUSE TO ETL) |
4. Process Details
| Process / Operation | TRANSPORTATION (ROHTAK TO AURANGABAD) |
| Outsource | No |
| Machine / Cell | TRANSPORTATION |
| Machine / Cell No. | TRANSPORTATION |
5. Problem Analysis
| Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
|---|---|---|---|
| Method | INSPECTION PLAN NOT EFFECTIVE | VALIDATED AND FOUND OK | X |
| Tool | ROLLING DIE WEAR | VALIDATED AND FOUND OK | X |
| Machine | NUT BOLTS MAY LOOSE | VALIDATED AND FOUND OK | X |
| Man | MISHANDLING OF MATERIAL | DURING TRANSPORTATION THREAD OF PART WAS NOT PROPERLY COVERED AND THREAD GOT DAMAGE OF SOME PIECES | O |
| Material | RM SIZE AND GRADE NOT OK | VALIDATED AND FOUND OK | X |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
| Inspection Method | Gauge |
| Other Inspection Method | |
| Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
| Checking Freq. | Sampling |
| Sampling | No |
| Sample Size | ACC PLAN |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
| Why 1 | M26 THREAD NOT OK. |
| Why 2 | DURING TRANSPORTATION FROM ROHTAK TO WAREHOUSE THREAD GOT DAMAGE. |
| Why 3 | THREAD WERE NOT PROPERLY COVERED IN PACKING. |
| Why 4 | SO THREAD GOT DAMAGE. |
| Why 5 | |
| Root Cause (Occurance) | DURING TRANSPORTATION FROM ROHTAK TO WAREHOUSE THREAD GOT DAMAGE.THREAD WERE NOT PROPERLY COVERED IN PACKING.SO THREAD GOT DAMAGE. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
| Why 1 | M26 THREAD NOT OK |
| Why 2 | TRANSPORT FACILITY WAS FIRST SHARED WITH OTHER COMPANIES. |
| Why 3 | DURING TRANSPORTATION HANDLING OF MATERIAL WAS NOT EFFECTIVE . |
| Why 4 | SO NG PART DISPATCHED TO CUSTOMER. |
| Why 5 | |
| Root Cause (Outflow) | TRANSPORT FACILITY WAS FIRST SHARED WITH OTHER COMPANIES.DURING TRANSPORTATION HANDLING OF MATERIAL WAS NOT EFFECTIVE .SO NG PART DISPATCHED TO CUSTOMER. |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
| Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outflow | TRANSPORTATION FACILITY CHANGED. NOW OUR MATERIAL WILL BE DISPATCHED DIRECTLY FROM ROHTAK TO WAREHOUSE WITH SINGLE TRANSPORT TO AVOID THE MISHANDLING OF MATERIAL. | GANESH MAURYA | 30/01/2023 | 31/01/2023 | Completed |
| Occurance | THREADS WERE PROPERLY COVERED WITH CAP AND PROPER BOX USED FOR PACKING TO AVOID THE CONTACT OF MATERIAL WITH EACH OTHER | GANESH MAURYA | 30/01/2023 | 31/01/2023 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
| Change In Inspection System | No |
| Change Details | NO CHANGE |
| Inspection Method | Gauge |
| Other Inspection Method | |
| Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
| Checking Freq. | Sampling |
| Sampling | No |
| Sample Size | ACC. PLAN |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
| Occurance (Before) |
THREAD WERE NOT COVERED IN PACKING 338_Occurance_Before.pdf |
| Occurance (After) |
THREADS WERE COVERED PROPERLY WITH CAP 338_Occurance_After.pdf |
| Outflow (Before) |
TRANSPORTATION MATERIAL HANDLING WAS NOT EFFECTIVE 338_Outflow_Before.pdf |
| Outflow (After) |
TRANSPORT FACILITY CHANGED. 338_Outflow_After.pdf |
11. Horizontal Deployment
| Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
| Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | ALL FORK BOLTS |
12. Document Review
| Documents | PackingStd |
| Specify Other Document | NO |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
| Reviewed Quantity | 300 |
| Reason for submission | Next lot verified and found ok |