QFR No - 8000817842
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000817842 |
NC Date | 20/01/2023 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | B2BK06823O |
Part Name | CALIPER BODY-PAINTED - ATHER FR |
Supplier Name & Code | 206460-TULJA ENTERPRISES |
ETL Plant | 1120-ETL K-226/2 Disc Brakes |
Defect Details | PANIT UNCOVER-AFTER 100% INSP. DUST, UNCOVER, ORANGE P |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | Paint uncover,dust,paint peel off |
Detection Stage | Receipt |
Problem Severity | Aesthetic |
NG Quantity | 30 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | tuljaenterprises.e124@gmail.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | info@tulja.in |
MD Email ID | tuljaenterprises.e124@gmail.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
30
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
30
|
Check Qty |
30
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
30
|
NG Qty |
30
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
30
|
Scrap | 0 |
Rework | 30 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
The touch up spray is under development. Once it will be developed, The issue be cured. Currently we are touching it up with existing paint. |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
Receipt of NG parts - Paint application and NG area - Baking - Visual inspection - Packing - Dispatch |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | Repainting |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | Paint Booth |
Machine / Cell No. | NA |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Man | Sensitive Shade | The shade is sensitive at curved areas | X |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | L4 Operator Deployed |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 100% |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | The component geometry is difficult to cover with electrostatic gun. |
Why 2 | The shade is sensitive |
Why 3 | Paint not applied properly |
Why 4 | Painter coverage was poor at curved area |
Why 5 | L3 Operator deployed at inspection stage |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Improper application of paint at curved and deep surface. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | L3 operator was deployed |
Why 2 | Inspector did not inspected properly |
Why 3 | Operator did not inspected the curved and deep surface of the component. |
Why 4 | Operator did not informed senior inspector |
Why 5 | Senior operator was not inspecting the parts |
Root Cause (Outflow) | L3 operator was deployed for inspection |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | Conventional gun will used for coverage at deep surface. | Operation Head | 03/02/2023 | 03/02/2023 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | Additional inspector placed for a month at the inspection stage |
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Visual |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 100% |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Uncover 339_Occurance_Before.jpg |
Occurance (After) |
Covered with iwata gun 339_Occurance_After.jpg |
Outflow (Before) |
Uncover 339_Outflow_Before.jpg |
Outflow (After) |
Ok. 339_Outflow_After.jpg |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | No |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | Paint Booth |
12. Document Review
Documents | |
Specify Other Document | NA |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 250 |
Reason for submission | Paint uncover 100% checked found ok |