QFR No - 8000820869
Defect Details
NC No. 8000820869
NC Date 20/02/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2FA08833M
Part Name FORK PIPE MACHINED (K-9207)
Supplier Name & Code 101030-TUBE INVESTMENTS OF INDIA LTD
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details TAPPING O/SIZE.-THREADING NOT OK
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Threading Not Ok
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 4
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID AmitVD@tii.murugappa.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID guptaajay@tii.murugappa.com
MD Email ID mukeshahuja@tii.murugappa.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
1300
0
0
400
0
1700
Check Qty
1300
0
0
400
0
1700
NG Qty
4
0
0
0
0
4
 
Scrap 4
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
1) All K-9207 TFF Model Stock checked at ETL K-228 WIP & SM sales Inhouse FG for Trending Not OK Concern. 2)Total NG Part Qty: 4 Nos. at ETL K-228 end. 3) 100 % WIP Material checked at TPI Aurangabad M/C Center (SM Sales) Also Blue Marker marking done as A Identification for Inspection & No NG Part Observed at TPI Aurangabad M/C Center (SM Sales)
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Incoming Material - Inward Inspection - Storage - CNC Machining Threading Side - CNC Machining Caulking Side - Drilling - Deburring - Final Inspection - Packing in Bins - Dispatch to ETL.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation CNC Machining Threading Side
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC Machining Cell
Machine / Cell No. CNC N0.10
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ToolThreading Major Dia UndersizeVerified through Gemba observation Threading Insert found wear before decided frequencyX
MethodInspection SOP not FollowedVerified through Gemba visit found Inspection for Threading done by using TPG on sampling BasisO
ManUnskilled OperatorVerified found Skilled OperatorO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 2 Nos./Hrs
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Threading Not OK
Why 2 Major Dia observed Undersize
Why 3 Threading Insert observed wear out before defined Insert change frequency.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Threading Insert observed wear out before defined Insert change frequency.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Threading Not OK
Why 2 Not detected during the Inspection by using Thread plug gauge
Why 3 Not Detected as the Inspection on Sampling basis 2 Nos./Hrs
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Not Detected as the Inspection on Sampling basis 2 Nos./Hrs
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceAfter Discussion with Production Incharge of machining Cell, Threding Insert change frequency changed from 450 Nos. per Corner to 350 Nos. per CornerMr. Rathod23/02/202323/02/2023Completed
OutflowSampling Inspection Qty. increased during hourly inspection by 2 Nos./Hrs to 5 Nos.Mr. Sandip Johare23/02/202323/02/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 100 % Inspection for Threading by using Thread plug gauge & Blue Marker marking done as A Identification for next 3 lot
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) 1) Threading Insert observed wear out before defined Insert change frequency. 2)Threading Insert change frequency was 450 Nos. per Corner.
376_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Threading Insert change frequency has been changed from 450 Nos. per Corner to 350 Nos. per Corner
376_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Not Detected as the Inspection on Sampling basis 2 Nos./Hrs
376_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Sampling Inspection Qty. increased during the hourly inspection by 2 Nos./Hrs to 5 Nos.
376_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All M/c`s at CNC Machining Cell
 
12. Document Review
Documents InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document Tool History Card
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 100
Reason for submission Ok