QFR No - 8000825774
Defect Details
NC No. 8000825774
NC Date 07/04/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2GN12502B
Part Name MAIN SPRING J1A & J1D
Supplier Name & Code 100180-BHALLA TECHTRAN INDUSTRIES LIM
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-SQUARENESS FOUND NOT OK
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Squareness found 2 mm against the spec of 1 mm
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 201
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@btlsprings.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID plant1@btlsprings.com
MD Email ID amitbhalla.btl@gmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2000
3000
0
1200
0
6200
Check Qty
2000
3000
0
1200
0
6200
NG Qty
201
12
0
0
0
213
 
Scrap 0
Rework 212
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Check the all material lying at customer end, ware house and in plant FG with proper stand on surface plate
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Coiling, Stress relieving 1st, End grinding, Shot peening, Stress relieving 2nd, Scragging, Final Inspection, PDI, Packing & Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation End Grinding
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC Grinder
Machine / Cell No. WNJ
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodGrinding wheel dressing not properDresser plate worn outX
ManUnskilled operatorOperator skill level OKO
MaterialRM not as per specificationRM found OKO
ToolWheel dresser unit not OKDresser plate worn outX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 05 Pcs
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 End grinding was in taper
Why 2 Grinding wheel surface not parallel
Why 3 Grinding wheel dressing was not proper
Why 4 Dresser plate worn out
Why 5 Dresser plate changing freq. not decided
Root Cause (Occurance) Dresser plate changing freq. not decided
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Defected parts not detect in PDI
Why 2 Sampling inspection
Why 3 100% inspection not possible with instruments
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Defected parts not detect due to sampling inspection on PDI stage
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceDresser plate changing freq. decided after 18000 nos.Rajesh10/04/202310/04/2023Completed
Outflow100% inspection started, Parts stand on surface plate before packingRajesh11/04/202311/04/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 100% inspection started before packing, Parts should be stand on surface plate
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size all
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) PFD & Control plan
400_Occurance_Before.xls
Occurance (After) Revised PFD & Control plan
400_Occurance_After.xls
Outflow (Before) Sampling Inspection
400_Outflow_Before.xlsx
Outflow (After) 100 % Inspection, parts should be stand on surface plate
400_Outflow_After.xlsx
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant CNC GRINDING MACHINE
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, WISOP, ProcessFlowChart
Specify Other Document NO
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 300
Reason for submission Verified and found ok