QFR No - 8000825775
Defect Details
NC No. 8000825775
NC Date 07/04/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520KH02402
Part Name REBOUND SPRING(949508058)
Supplier Name & Code 100185-HELICAL SPRINGS
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-OUTER DIA OVERSIZE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Outer dia found oversize by 1 mm
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 181
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID Prabhat@helicalsprings.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID awadhwa@helicalsprings.in
MD Email ID ataneja@helicalsprings.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
7000
0
0
0
0
7000
Check Qty
7000
0
0
0
0
7000
NG Qty
181
0
0
0
0
181
 
Scrap 181
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100 % material segregation done at Customer end.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM INSP --> COILING --> SR1 --> GRINDING --> SHOT PEENING --> SR2 --> FINAL INSPECTION --> OILING
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation COILING, FINAL INPSECTION
Outsource No
Machine / Cell COILING, FINAL INSPECTION
Machine / Cell No. HTC 80 CF
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodWire Dia wrong usedwire Dia check for 2402 Found okX
MachineOvality in the Spring ODSpring OD check & Found okX
MethodWrong Model parts Mix upPhysically check & Found wrong model mix upO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size As per Lot
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Outer Dia Over size Issue
Why 2 Defected parts Observed with Diff. wire dia ( Another Model )
Why 3 Wrong model part mix up in packing stage
Why 4 Diff diff model parts packing done on Common packing table
Why 5 No rule defined Related to packing
Root Cause (Occurance) Diff Diff model parts packing done on Common packing table , No rule defined related to packing
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Defect Not detect during PDI inspection
Why 2 PDI Sampling Insp qty Less, N=5 Nos
Why 3 No Doc audit System for Final dispatch pats
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) No Doc audit System for Final dispatch pats
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceRule defined for packing Only one model parts packing in one time , Before another model packing operator finish the previous Model packing & EnsurePradeep sharma10/04/202319/04/2023Completed
OutflowSampling Inspection Qty Increase to 20 Nos Visual against 5 Nos & Dock audit to be implementedBharat Pathak10/04/202319/04/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details No change in inspection system only sampling inspection freq Increase
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Dock audit implement
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 20 Nos per
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Before rule not defined
401_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Rule defined for packing operation
401_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Before sampling insp qty 05 Nos in PDI
401_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) After sampling Insp Qty Increase 20 Nos in PDI
401_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant plant 104
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA
Specify Other Document Rule defined & OPL
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission ok