QFR No - 8000827040
Defect Details
NC No. 8000827040
NC Date 22/04/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. S3LZ00312B
Part Name SPACER -TVS KING FRONT
Supplier Name & Code 100106-SHARP ENGINEERS.
ETL Plant 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension
Defect Details DIAMETER OVER SIZE-I D OVERSIZE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Inner dia. found oversize by 0.1 to 0.18 mm.
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 508
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@apw3.co.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID kurund.ma@sharp-engineers.com
MD Email ID urkhandelwal@sharp-engineers.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
3500
0
0
1000
0
4500
Check Qty
3500
0
0
1000
0
4500
NG Qty
508
0
0
162
0
670
 
Scrap 670
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Segregation by Plug gauge
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM Receipt Inspection, RM Storage, Parting and Drilling, Chamfering,Taping,Milling,OD Grinding,Plating,Inward Inspection of Plating,Final Inspection,PDIR,Packing and Dispatch.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Parting and Drilling
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Traub
Machine / Cell No. 7
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
Material--O
MachineNG process parameter.Check sheet verified found OK as per requirement.O
ToolWrong Drill usedResharpening is done on Drill manuallyX
MethodDrill size verification after drill re-sharpening.Drill size verified found OK, but no any verification check point after drill re-sharpening.X
ManUnskilled operatorOperator Level verified, found adequate.O
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size As per CP
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 ID 9.7+0.2 observed oversized upto 10 mm
Why 2 Drill size observed on higher side after resharpening
Why 3 Drill re-sharpening was in adequate.
Why 4 Drill re-sharpening to be done manually.
Why 5 No any adequate method.
Root Cause (Occurance) No any adequate method available for drill re-sharpening & same results to oversize drilling
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 ID 9.7+0.2 observed oversized upto 10 mm
Why 2 Not detected during in process inspection
Why 3 sample basis inspection during in-process.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Sample basis inpection
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceDrill inspection at Setup and Tool changeProduction Supervisor25/04/202325/04/2023Completed
Outflow100% inspection at Q gateQA Supervisor25/04/202325/04/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details -
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size is2500
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) -
430_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) -
430_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) -
430_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) -
430_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant -
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document -
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 10
Reason for submission Corrective action parts submission.