QFR No - 8000827812
Defect Details
| NC No. | 8000827812 |
| NC Date | 28/04/2023 |
| NC Submission Date | |
| Part No. | S3GD01938B |
| Part Name | INNER TUBE BALL PASSED-TVS KING REAR |
| Supplier Name & Code | 100876-ACCRETE ELECTROMECH PVT.LTD. |
| ETL Plant | 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension |
| Defect Details | STREGHTNESS NOT OK-STREGHTNESS NOT OK |
1. Problem Description
| Defect Description | Straightness not Ok concern observed. |
| Detection Stage | Receipt |
| Problem Severity | Fitment |
| NG Quantity | 507 |
| Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
| Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
| Quality Head Email ID | qahead@accrete.in |
| Plant Head/CEO Email ID | ppc@accrete.in |
| MD Email ID | damodani@accrete.in |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
| Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Qty |
3000
|
0
|
0
|
800
|
0
|
3800
|
| Check Qty |
3000
|
0
|
0
|
800
|
0
|
3800
|
| NG Qty |
507
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
0
|
607
|
| Scrap | 607 |
| Rework | 0 |
| Under Deviation | 0 |
| Containment Action |
|---|
| 100% inspection done for inner diameter at ETL as well as AEPL end. |
3. Process Flow
| Process Flow Description |
|---|
| 1. Raw tube receipt 2. Tube cutting 3. Washing 4. Tube chamfering 5. Dispatch |
4. Process Details
| Process / Operation | Raw material |
| Outsource | Yes |
| Machine / Cell | NA |
| Machine / Cell No. | NA |
5. Problem Analysis
| Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material | RM tube defect | RM tube defect | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
| Inspection Method | Gauge |
| Other Inspection Method | |
| Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
| Checking Freq. | Sampling |
| Sampling | No |
| Sample Size | 10 nos |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
| Why 1 | Straightness not ok issue observed |
| Why 2 | RM Defect |
| Why 3 | |
| Why 4 | |
| Why 5 | |
| Root Cause (Occurance) | RM Defect (Communicated with supplier) |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
| Why 1 | Straightness not ok issue observed |
| Why 2 | Straightness not inspected at AEPL |
| Why 3 | 100 percent inspection not performed |
| Why 4 | ID Straightness inspected on sample basis |
| Why 5 | |
| Root Cause (Outflow) | ID Straightness inspected on sample basis |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
| Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outflow | 100% inspection started with straightness gauge before dispatch | Prakash ade | 03/05/2023 | 03/05/2023 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
| Change In Inspection System | Yes |
| Change Details | 100% inspection with straightness gauge started |
| Inspection Method | Gauge |
| Other Inspection Method | |
| Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
| Checking Freq. | 100% |
| Sampling | No |
| Sample Size | 100% |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
| Occurance (Before) |
Not applicable 441_Occurance_Before.xlsx |
| Occurance (After) |
Not applicable 441_Occurance_After.xlsx |
| Outflow (Before) |
SOP of SOCO cutting machine does not contain straightness parameter. 441_Outflow_Before.xlsx |
| Outflow (After) |
SOP of SOCO cutting machine updated and straightness inspection added in it. 441_Outflow_After.xlsx |
11. Horizontal Deployment
| Horizontal Deployment Required | No |
| Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | Not applicable |
12. Document Review
| Documents | WISOP, InspCheckSheet |
| Specify Other Document | OPL |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
| Reviewed Quantity | 10 |
| Reason for submission | Corrective action parts submission. |