QFR No - 8000833966
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000833966 |
NC Date | 23/06/2023 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | F2FA15933M |
Part Name | FORK PIPE MACHINED (K19 DRUM FF) |
Supplier Name & Code | 100634-TATA STEEL LIMITED |
ETL Plant | 1126-ETL Pantnagar |
Defect Details | DIMN.U/SIZE.-DIM. U/D OB 8.5 AGINST 11MM |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | Fitment Issue : DIMENSION UNDERSIZE.-OBSERVATION 8.50 MM AGAINST 11.00 MM |
Detection Stage | Inprocess |
Problem Severity | Fitment |
NG Quantity | 215 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
Defect Sketch / Photo | ri0exybddt0kzupjmkggm1ck.docx |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | bipldholpur@gmail.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | harsh.pareek@tatasteel.com |
MD Email ID | Praveens@tatasteel.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
500
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
200
|
700
|
Check Qty |
500
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
200
|
700
|
NG Qty |
100
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
115
|
Scrap | 15 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
100 % Inspection done at ETL and next lots to be supplied only after 100% inspection at TSL end. |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
CNC 1st set up (Threading) |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | CNC Turning |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | CNC- Marshall |
Machine / Cell No. | 03 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Material | No Probable root cause related to material | No Probable root cause related to material | O |
Tool | No Probable root cause related to material | No Probable root cause related to material | O |
Man | No Probable root cause related to material | No Probable root cause related to material | O |
Machine | Hydraullic Pressure Variation | Hydraulic Oil, Internal Leakage in chuck Cylinder | X |
Method | Lot of sampling was small | Due to small lot size , Defected Pieces can Skip | X |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 05 |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Fork pipe K19 of Dim under size |
Why 2 | Hydraullic Oil Presssure Varry |
Why 3 | Hydraulic Oil, Internal Leakage in chuck Cylinder |
Why 4 | No Check Point in System |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Hydraullic oil Internally leakage in Chuck Cylinder due to this Pressure Varry |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Fork pipe K19 of Dim under size |
Why 2 | Not detected in, Inhouse Inspection |
Why 3 | Lot of sampling was small ( 5 Pcs Hourly) |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Lot of sampling was small ( 5 Pcs Hourly) |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | 1- check Point added in daily Maintenance check sheet | QA | 12/05/2023 | 12/05/2023 | Completed |
Outflow | 1.-Lot of Sampling Increases From 5 pcs Hourly to 25 Pcs Hourly 2- Given OPL On this Problem | QA Supervisor | 12/05/2023 | 12/05/2023 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | Lot of Sampling Increases ( From 5 pcs Hourly to 25 Pcs Hourly ) |
Inspection Method | Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 05 |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
NO CHECK POINT DAILY PM CHECKLIST 492_Occurance_Before.jpg |
Occurance (After) |
CHECK POINT ADDED INDAILY PM CHECKLIST 492_Occurance_After.jpg |
Outflow (Before) |
05 Pcs Checked Hourly 492_Outflow_Before.jpg |
Outflow (After) |
25 Pcs Checked Hourly 492_Outflow_After.jpg |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | ALL CNC MACHINE |
12. Document Review
Documents | ControlPlan, PMCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | NA |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 2000 |
Reason for submission | OK |