QFR No - 8000834724
Defect Details
NC No. 8000834724
NC Date 27/06/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2AB02207B
Part Name ADJUSTER POWDER COATED KTEM
Supplier Name & Code 100973-TESMO MOTORCAST PRIVATE LIMITE
ETL Plant 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension
Defect Details EXCESS MATERIAL-EXCESS MATERIAL AT SPRING RESTING FACE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Excess material observed at spring resting face.
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 19
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID rkhare@tesmomotorcast.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID harish.bala@tesmomotorcast.com
MD Email ID svkallani@tesmomotorcast.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2000
0
0
3000
10000
15000
Check Qty
2000
0
0
3000
5000
10000
NG Qty
20
0
0
2
300
322
 
Scrap 20
Rework 302
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
1). Pin flash rework process started. 2). 100% inspection before powder coating.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
C-REAMER-GRINDING-SURFACE TREATMENT-INSPECTION-POWDER COATING-SAMPLE INSPECTION-PACKING DESPATCH
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation PDC
Outsource No
Machine / Cell HPDC MACHINE
Machine / Cell No. 350-1
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MaterialINSERT MATERIAL NOT GOODCHEMICAL COMPOSITION VARIFICATIONO
MachineEJECITON NOT BALANCEVISUAL CHECK FOR EJECTION PARALLILITYO
ToolEJECTOR PIN DIA ON MOVING INSERT INCREASESVERNIERO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method VISUAL
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 1
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 PIN FLASH ON SPRING RESTING FACE
Why 2 EJECTOR PIN INCREASE ON INSERT
Why 3 DIE RUNNING WITH UNBALANCE EJECTION
Why 4 SETTING NOT DONE CORRECTLY
Why 5 POOR SKILL LEVEL
Root Cause (Occurance) EJECTOR SETTING SKILL LEVEL NOT GOOD
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 PIN FLASH ON SPRING RESTING FACE
Why 2 PIN FLASH CHECKING IS MISSED BY INSPECTOR
Why 3 IMPROPER TRAINING TO INSPECTOR
Why 4 VISUAL DISPLAY NOT AVAILABLE
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) VISUAL DISPLAY OF PIN FLASH NOT AVAILABLE
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowPIN & DIAMETER CHECKINGSACHIN15/07/202315/07/2023Completed
OccuranceVISUAL DISPLAY AT INSPECTION WITH PROPER TRAININGRAHUL KHARE15/07/202315/07/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details VISUAL DISPLAY IN INSPECTION TABLE WITH SAMPLE
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method VISUAL
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 1
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) PART WITH PIN FLASH
500_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) EJECTOR PIN DIA INCREASE
500_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) PART WITH PIN FLASH
500_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) SAMPLE PLACED ON FINAL STAGE
500_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant NO
 
12. Document Review
Documents InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document PART DISPLAY
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 10
Reason for submission Against reported defect.