QFR No - 8000834816
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000834816 |
NC Date | 29/06/2023 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | S2BG02502B |
Part Name | BRACKET UN P/C KTEP |
Supplier Name & Code | 100973-TESMO MOTORCAST PRIVATE LIMITE |
ETL Plant | 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension |
Defect Details | BROKEN-BROKEN AT BUSH FITTING STAGE |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | Part Broken during assembly condition. This is very serious as well as safety critical concern, & may leads to field complaint. |
Detection Stage | Inprocess |
Problem Severity | Safety |
NG Quantity | 2 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | rkhare@tesmomotorcast.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | harish.bala@tesmomotorcast.com |
MD Email ID | svkallani@tesmomotorcast.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
3000
|
0
|
0
|
3000
|
4000
|
10000
|
Check Qty |
3000
|
0
|
0
|
3000
|
4000
|
10000
|
NG Qty |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
Scrap | 1 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
Checking started in final stage with dot mark at bottom side |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
PDC - REAMER - DEBURRING - INSPECTION - SURFACE TREATMENT - CHAMFER - TAPPING - PACKING |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | PDC |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | DIE CASTING MACHINE |
Machine / Cell No. | 250-02 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Tool | CORE OUT INCOMPLETE | PHYSICAL | O |
Method | EJECTION UNEVEN | VISUAL | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | VISUAL |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 1 |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Part cracked from its I-section |
Why 2 | I-section area get weak due to hair crack generation |
Why 3 | Part get tilted in hot condition while ejection process in PDC |
Why 4 | Core not completely out and ejection done |
Why 5 | Core slider Jam due to flash inside core sliding area |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Machine run with flash in core area. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Cracked part found at customer end |
Why 2 | Crack not checked |
Why 3 | KTEP parts particular location crack checking not happening in final stage |
Why 4 | Checking points not provided |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Point not available in check point of inspection |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outflow | Crack check point added in inspection | Ankush | 29/06/2023 | 30/06/2023 | Completed |
Occurance | Tool to run with flash free | Ravi | 28/06/2023 | 30/06/2023 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | Crack checking for this specific location incorporated in final inspection |
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Visual |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 1 |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Flash at core side 498_Occurance_Before.jpeg |
Occurance (After) |
Zero flash 498_Occurance_After.jpeg |
Outflow (Before) |
Cracked Part 498_Outflow_Before.jpeg |
Outflow (After) |
Quality Alert Displayed 498_Outflow_After.jpeg |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | KWPK |
12. Document Review
Documents | InspCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | Alert displayed |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 10 |
Reason for submission | Corrective action parts submission. |