QFR No - 8000834816
Defect Details
NC No. 8000834816
NC Date 29/06/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2BG02502B
Part Name BRACKET UN P/C KTEP
Supplier Name & Code 100973-TESMO MOTORCAST PRIVATE LIMITE
ETL Plant 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension
Defect Details BROKEN-BROKEN AT BUSH FITTING STAGE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Part Broken during assembly condition. This is very serious as well as safety critical concern, & may leads to field complaint.
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Safety
NG Quantity 2
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID rkhare@tesmomotorcast.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID harish.bala@tesmomotorcast.com
MD Email ID svkallani@tesmomotorcast.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
3000
0
0
3000
4000
10000
Check Qty
3000
0
0
3000
4000
10000
NG Qty
0
0
0
0
1
1
 
Scrap 1
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Checking started in final stage with dot mark at bottom side
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
PDC - REAMER - DEBURRING - INSPECTION - SURFACE TREATMENT - CHAMFER - TAPPING - PACKING
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation PDC
Outsource No
Machine / Cell DIE CASTING MACHINE
Machine / Cell No. 250-02
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ToolCORE OUT INCOMPLETEPHYSICALO
MethodEJECTION UNEVENVISUALO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method VISUAL
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 1
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Part cracked from its I-section
Why 2 I-section area get weak due to hair crack generation
Why 3 Part get tilted in hot condition while ejection process in PDC
Why 4 Core not completely out and ejection done
Why 5 Core slider Jam due to flash inside core sliding area
Root Cause (Occurance) Machine run with flash in core area.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Cracked part found at customer end
Why 2 Crack not checked
Why 3 KTEP parts particular location crack checking not happening in final stage
Why 4 Checking points not provided
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Point not available in check point of inspection
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowCrack check point added in inspectionAnkush29/06/202330/06/2023Completed
OccuranceTool to run with flash freeRavi28/06/202330/06/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Crack checking for this specific location incorporated in final inspection
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 1
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Flash at core side
498_Occurance_Before.jpeg
Occurance (After) Zero flash
498_Occurance_After.jpeg
Outflow (Before) Cracked Part
498_Outflow_Before.jpeg
Outflow (After) Quality Alert Displayed
498_Outflow_After.jpeg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant KWPK
 
12. Document Review
Documents InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document Alert displayed
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 10
Reason for submission Corrective action parts submission.