QFR No - 8000836624
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000836624 |
NC Date | 13/07/2023 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | 550FA18433 |
Part Name | FORK PIPE MACHINED - K11 |
Supplier Name & Code | 101222-SANGKAJ ENGINEERING PVT LTD- U |
ETL Plant | 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension |
Defect Details | NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-QM-VL-KDH - THREADING NG |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | Threading NG found at incoming |
Detection Stage | Receipt |
Problem Severity | Fitment |
NG Quantity | 108 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | No |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | irfan@sangkaj.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | steel@sangkaj.com |
MD Email ID | anirudh.2007@hotmail.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
1000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1000
|
Check Qty |
1000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1000
|
NG Qty |
108
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
108
|
Scrap | 108 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
Segregation of all pipe line material at customer as well as warehouse and SEPL end. |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
10. RM Inward inspection 20.Identification groove 30.Induction hardening 40.Bend removal 50.CNC Turning First 60. CNC turning second 70. Drilling 80.Air Cleaning 90.Packing and Dispatch |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | 50. CNC Turning First |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | CNC Fork Pipe Cell |
Machine / Cell No. | Cell no.3 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Method | Gauge Wear out | Gauge Wear out | O |
Tool | Tool wear out | Insert/tool manufacturer changed | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | No |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 5 per hour |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Thread undersize (Go not pass) |
Why 2 | Tool wear out before its life |
Why 3 | Wrong grade insert taken for use |
Why 4 | Insert grade/Manufacturer not mentioned in control plan. |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Due Insert grade/Manufacturer not mentioned in control plan wrong grade insert taken for use. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Thread undersize (Go not pass) not detected |
Why 2 | Part found ok on gauge |
Why 3 | Gauge wear out not detected |
Why 4 | Wear ring gauge not available |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Wear ring gauge not available |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | Add insert grade and Manufacturer in Control plan | Mr. Krushna Fuke | 02/08/2023 | 01/08/2023 | Completed |
Outflow | Procure wear ring gauge | Mr.Irfan | 30/08/2023 | 08/09/2023 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | No |
Change Details | Wear ring added |
Inspection Method | Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | No |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | Plan |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Threading insert specification and Make not available 509_Occurance_Before.pdf |
Occurance (After) |
Threading insert make and grade updated in control plan 509_Occurance_After.pdf |
Outflow (Before) |
Wear gauge not available 509_Outflow_Before.xlsx |
Outflow (After) |
wear gauge ordered and made available up to 30.08.23 509_Outflow_After.jpeg |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | All fork pipe model |
12. Document Review
Documents | ControlPlan, WISOP |
Specify Other Document | No |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 150 |
Reason for submission | Ok |