QFR No - 8000859513
Defect Details
NC No. 8000859513
NC Date 19/01/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F1LG00902B
Part Name SEAT PIPE -K86A
Supplier Name & Code 100538-NARINDER PARKASH AND CO
ETL Plant 1146-ETL Suspension Narasapura
Defect Details MIX UP OTHER MODEL-NOT USING K0PG MODEL MIX UP AT NP SUP
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description K86 seat pipe wrong part supplied to ETL not using KOPG FF model MIX up at supplier end .
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 250
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@npcindustries.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID anand@npcindustries.in
MD Email ID ajay@npcindustries.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
4400
0
0
400
0
4800
Check Qty
4400
0
0
400
0
4800
NG Qty
250
0
0
0
0
250
 
Scrap 0
Rework 250
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
segregated all material at both end
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Cutting - Draw - Forging - Rough Grinding - Punching - CNC Head Turning - CNC Tail Facing - Tapping & Chamfering - Final Grinding - Final Inspection - Cleaning - RPO Oiling - Packing & Dispatch.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Packing station
Outsource No
Machine / Cell STATION-2
Machine / Cell No. NA
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManQuality Inspector NegligenceVerified and found OK. No linkage with defectO
ToolWrong gauge and instrument useMeasuring instrument is found calibrated & ok condition.O
Methodmaterial stock place not defineMaterial stock place was identifiedO
MethodPacking Method InadequateInside material polybag was not identifiedX
MethodHolding the part not as per define methodVerified and found OK. No linkage with defectO
MethodWrong identification tagAfter verification we found wrong identification tag foundX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Other model box replace with K-86 box
Why 2 mixing was occur in Packing station
Why 3 Other model parts box put together with the box of k-86 model
Why 4 Identification mark was not available before final packing
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Identification mark was not available before final packing
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Other model box replace with K-86 box
Why 2 Material was mixed after final inspection
Why 3 wrong sticker pasted as per identification mark at dispatch station.
Why 4 Verification point was not available at dispatch station
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Verification point was not available at dispatch station
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceModel details should be written at the starting of packingMr. Ankush22/01/202422/01/2024Completed
OccuranceQ-alert to be displayed at final and packing stationMr. Princ20/01/202420/01/2024Completed
OutflowSample inspection started of packed lots after packing.. Mr. Ankush22/01/202422/01/2024Completed
OutflowQ-alert to be displayed at Dispatch stationMr. Princ20/01/202420/01/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Sampling method to be used for reverification.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection No
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 5 box/lot
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Model details was written at the end of packing.
645_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) Model details should be written at the starting of packing.
645_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) No verification done
645_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Sample inspection started of packed lots after packing.
645_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All similar models .
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP
Specify Other Document No
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 10000
Reason for submission Reviewed next 3 lots no mixes up found ok