QFR No - 8000862162
Defect Details
NC No. 8000862162
NC Date 07/02/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2KH01002B
Part Name REBOUND SPRING-XF121
Supplier Name & Code 101159-TECHNOMAT SPRINGS
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-MIX-UP
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Other model part mix-up
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 100
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@technomatsprings.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID technomatsprings@gmail.com
MD Email ID patilsadanand@technomatsprings.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
3000
0
0
1800
0
4800
Check Qty
3000
0
0
1800
0
4800
NG Qty
100
0
0
0
0
100
 
Scrap 0
Rework 100
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Checked all material at customer end and pipeline material also.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
R/m In-warding Inspection > Coiling > Stress Relieving-1 > Grinding > Shot Peening > Stress Relieving-2 > Final Inspection > Oiling > Packing > Dispatch.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Coiling
Outsource No
Machine / Cell -
Machine / Cell No. -
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MaterialWrong Material / GradeSupplier RMTC Report checked found OkO
Machine--O
ToolTool Wear OutTool Monitoring Card Verified found okO
ManUnskilled OperatorSkilled matrix found okO
MethodWithout looking the complete part no.Dispatched wrong material without verify complete part no.X
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 30 Nos
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Material Mix-up at customer end
Why 2 Due to wrong material dispatched
Why 3 the material was not identified due to the similar part kept aside of the each other, and packing std was same.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) the material was not identified due to the similar part kept aside of the each other, and packing was same.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Material Mix-up at customer end
Why 2 Due to wrong material dispatched
Why 3 Separate place defined for the similar parts and packing (Polybag) change for to avoid the mix-up issues.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Separate place defined for the similar parts and packing (Polybag) change for to avoid the mix-up issues.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Outflow1) Location defined for the similar springs 2) Training given to related person.Mr. Anuj Shelke29/02/202429/02/2024Completed
OccurancePolybag color change to avoid mix-up issues.Mr. Anuj Shelke29/02/202429/02/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details NA
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 30 Nos
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Packing Before
658_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Packing After
658_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Outflow Before
658_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Outflow After
658_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant For the similar type of products.
 
12. Document Review
Documents PackingStd
Specify Other Document NA
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 438
Reason for submission Found ok