QFR No - 8000862173
Defect Details
NC No. 8000862173
NC Date 07/02/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2PD02007B
Part Name UPPER BRACKET P/C-XF-1C1
Supplier Name & Code 100001-ANANT ENTERPRISES
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details RUNOUT-BLOW HOLE, PIN HOLE AND CUT MARKS
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Casting defects
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 50
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID anandkulkarni@anantgroup.co.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID pramodgosavi@anantgroup.co.in
MD Email ID ashwinjoshi@anantgroup.co.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
200
0
0
150
100
450
Check Qty
200
0
0
150
100
450
NG Qty
50
0
0
19
0
69
 
Scrap 69
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100 % parts checked and identification mark provide on part.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Raw material received - Storage - Melting - Molten metal transfer to holding - Metal treatment - Die preparation - Casting - Cutting - grinding - Heat Treatment - Visual inspection - Powder coating - machining - final inspection - dispatch.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Casting, powder coating, & Machining.
Outsource No
Machine / Cell pF no 3
Machine / Cell No. GDC M/c
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManThe operator was not skilledSkill matrixO
MaterialOther material usedOk material usedO
MachineSolidification time reduced.Timer check found okO
MethodDie coating process.Air vent not cleaned die coat accumulatedX
Toolother tool usedOK tool used.O
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Pin hole due to turbulence
Why 2 Turbulence due to air entrapment
Why 3 Insufficient air vents
Why 4 Die coat accumulated in air vent
Why 5 Die coat not cleaned after coating apply.
Root Cause (Occurance) Die coat not cleaned after coating apply.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Visual inspection not done.
Why 2 Defect severity not aware.
Why 3 Training in effective.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Training in effective.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowTraining provided to final inspectors.Mr Nisar28/02/202428/02/2024Completed
Occurance1) Air vent cleaning frequency increased. 2) Periodically verification started.Mr Sunil Monde28/02/202428/02/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 100% parts checked
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) PM check sheet before
669_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) PM check sheet after
669_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) No Training
669_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Training given to inspectors
669_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant no
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA
Specify Other Document no
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 210
Reason for submission Found ok