QFR No - 8000863605
Defect Details
NC No. 8000863605
NC Date 19/02/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520AE00100
Part Name CORE PLATE CAL 115
Supplier Name & Code 100915-CHIRAG DIE CAST PVT LTD
ETL Plant 1132-ETL K-226/1 TRANSMISSION
Defect Details BROKEN-CLAW BROKEN
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Claw Broken Issue observed at Customer End (BAL Waluj)
Detection Stage Customer End
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 1
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID qualityassurance@chiragdiecast.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID operationshead@chiragdiecast.com
MD Email ID chirag.gupta@chiragdiecast.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
12000
32000
10000
0
5000
59000
Check Qty
12000
32000
10000
0
5000
59000
NG Qty
0
2
0
0
0
2
 
Scrap 2
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All Material Rechecked visually & 2 Nos. found NG out of 59000 Nos.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
PDC, Trimming, Shot Blasting , Visual Inspection, Stress Relieving ,100% Gauging for Flatness , Packing , Transportation
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation High Pressure Die Casting
Outsource No
Machine / Cell HPDC
Machine / Cell No. PDC
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodClaw Broken During Transit from CDC to Aurangabad02 Nos. found Claw Broken at Godown Aurangabad after transitO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Claw Broken observed at Customer End
Why 2 Claw Broken of the Part during Transit
Why 3 Bottom Part Could not bear the heavy jerk during Transit
Why 4 Mis handling by Transporter
Why 5 Not Proper Stacking inside the vehicle.
Root Cause (Occurance) All 4 Bundles ( 125 Nos.) did not having the Corrugated sheet duly covered with bubble sheet to resist the jerk during transit .
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Could not Checked by Local Representative at Godown ; Aurangabad during material transfer fro Corrugated Box to Plastic Bins
Why 2 No such type issue observed at Godown.
Why 3
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Visual Inspection skipped during Material Transfer from Corrugated Boxes to Plastic Bins.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccurancePP Box Cartons development is in process , We will send you o1 PP Box to ETL with next lot on dated 03-04-2024Naveen Kumar03/04/202417/04/2024Completed
OccuranceAfter Approval of PP Box , We will start supply in PP Box.Naveen Kumar20/04/202417/04/2024Completed
OccuranceModified Packaging in PP Cartons in place of Corrugated BoxMr. Naveen Kumar & Mr. Sushil ( ETL)10/04/202417/04/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details No Change
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100 %
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) There was no Corrugated sheet at the Top & Bottom of the Carton
685_Occurance_Before.jpeg
Occurance (After) PP Cartons development under process , Sample photo attached herewith for your review & approval
685_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) No Inspection of the Bundles during material Transfer from PP box to Plastic Bins.
685_Outflow_Before.png
Outflow (After) 100% Inspection of the Bundles ( Specially Top & Bottom Pcs of the Bundle)
685_Outflow_After.png
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant 1132
 
12. Document Review
Documents PackingStd
Specify Other Document Packing standard rev
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 20000
Reason for submission OK Material Received in PP Box