QFR No - 8000872282
Defect Details
NC No. 8000872282
NC Date 24/04/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 550FA19033
Part Name FORK PIPE M/CED-(HMS-30 & HMP-30)
Supplier Name & Code 101186-SANGKAJ BRIGHT WIRES PRIVATE L
ETL Plant 1143-ETL Suspension Halol, Vadodara
Defect Details THREADING NOT OK-M26 THREAD NO GO QUALITFY
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Fork pipe M26 x 1-6H Thread No Go Qualify and After Assembly Mating Part Open in process due to thread NG.
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Safety
NG Quantity 11
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo sx54kcwuj1hqagksy3cngh00.jpg
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID shivpal@sangkaj.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID steel@sangkaj.com
MD Email ID anirudh.2007@hotmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
15500
0
0
4900
0
20400
Check Qty
15500
0
0
4900
0
20400
NG Qty
11
0
0
2
0
13
 
Scrap 13
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
segregation of all fork pipe line material at customer ETL Halol as well as inhouse
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
000.Receipt of Material, 010 inward inspection, 020 CNC Turn1st, 030 CNC Turn-2nd , 040 Drilling, 050 Final Inspection, 060 Anti Rust Oil Application, 070Air Cleaning, 080 Dispatched
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation 020 CNC Turn1st
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC fork pipe
Machine / Cell No. CNC 02
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineWEAR OFFSET LOCKWEAR OFFSET NOT LOCK IN CNC MACHINEX
ManNEW OPERATORSKILLED OPERATORO
MaterialMATERIAL HARDNESS MOREMATERIAL HARDNESS OKO
MethodINSERT CHANGE WIINSERT CHANGE WI NOT AVAILABLEX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection No
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 5nos/hrs
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 M26X1-6H Threading NO-GO Tight
Why 2 threading minor diameter was at higher side
Why 3 at the time of correction operator taken 0.3mm offset instead of 0.03mm
Why 4 wrong offset given by operator
Why 5 wear offset not lock in CNC machine
Root Cause (Occurance) Wear offset not lock in CNC Machine.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 M26X1-6H Threading No-Go Tight
Why 2 Inspection skipped by Operator and line Inspector
Why 3 Inspection Done On Sampling Basis. (5 Nos / Lot)
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Inspection Done On Sampling Basis. (5 Nos / Lot).
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowAt Final Inspection stage we have started the 100% inspection at with the help of thread plug gauge up to till date no any defective part found. We will doining inspectionupto 15.05.2024. Then we will doing inspection as per IS 2500 Standard.Mr. Amol Rathod25/04/202425/04/2024Completed
Occurancewear offset locked by 0.03mm in CNC machineMr. Bijay maity25/04/202425/04/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 100% Inspection with the help of thread plug gauge & plug gauge before supply the ETL With identification mark on Ok Part.
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size ALL PART
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Wear offset not lock in CNC machine.
756_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) Wear Offset locked By 0.03mm In CNC Machine.
756_Occurance_After.jfif
Outflow (Before) Final Inspection Stage Frequency has 5 Nos/Lot
756_Outflow_Before.jpeg
Outflow (After) At Final Inspection stage we have started the 100% inspection at with the help of thread plug gauge up to till date no any defective part found. We will doing inspection unto 15.05.2024. Then we will doing inspection as per IS 2500 Standard
756_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant FORK PIPE HMS30& HMP30 (550FA19033)
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP
Specify Other Document NO
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 500
Reason for submission 500 part checked not ok part not found