QFR No - 8000873543
Defect Details
NC No. 8000873543
NC Date 06/05/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2FQ00307B
Part Name HOLDER HANDLE LOWER P/C (XF-521)
Supplier Name & Code 201092-PRANEEL INDUSTRIES
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details DAMAGES-CASTING DENT AND DAMAGE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description CASTING DENT AND DAMAGE
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 19
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@praneelgroup.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID praneelindustries@rediiffmail.com
MD Email ID anilpatil@praneelgroup.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
100
0
0
0
100
200
Check Qty
100
0
0
0
0
100
NG Qty
19
0
0
0
0
19
 
Scrap 19
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All WIP checked at all end . Defective parts rejected.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Casting - powder coating - machining - final inspection - packing - dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation MACHING
Outsource No
Machine / Cell 01
Machine / Cell No. 01
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodPacking method not as per required packing standard.Verify packing standard for this part and found NG for packing standard.X
MachineDent and damage on the machine.Verify the clamping on the machine with input and output material and found ok on the machine.O
ManPacking person not aware about packing of the material.Verify the skill about packaging and found new manpower for packing.X
ToolTooling for manufacturing this part not as per required.Verify the machine toolings and found Ok.O
MaterialWrong material used for the process.Verify the material and found as per drawing.O
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method VISUAL
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Dent / Damages on parts
Why 2 Dent / Damages while packing
Why 3 Without partition packing in bins
Why 4 Packing standard not followed
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Packing standard not followed
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Dent / Damage observed during packing
Why 2 Dent / Damage observed during dispatch.
Why 3
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) packing operator was not aware of this.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowPacking Standard followed for avoided dent damagesuraj madhavi10/04/202411/04/2024Completed
OccurancePartition add to bins avoided metal to metal contact.Madhav gaikwad10/04/202411/04/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details -
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method VISUAL
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) PACKING NOT OK, METAL TO METAL CONTACT.
794_Occurance_Before.pptx
Occurance (After) Partition add to bins avoided metal to metal contact.
794_Occurance_After.pptx
Outflow (Before) Skipped from final inspection
794_Outflow_Before.xlsx
Outflow (After) Training & awareness given to final inspector
794_Outflow_After.xlsx
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant -
 
12. Document Review
Documents PackingStd
Specify Other Document Q-ALERT
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission OK