QFR No - 8000874401
Defect Details
NC No. 8000874401
NC Date 15/05/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2HT03607B
Part Name OUTER SPRING POWDER COATED
Supplier Name & Code 100186-SAGAR SPRINGS PRIVATE LIMITED
ETL Plant 1143-ETL Suspension Halol, Vadodara
Defect Details POWDER COATING NOT OK-POWDER COATING NOT OK
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Heavy powder coating defect
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 2
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo smnodm11zr4stedlcpv3uset.jpg
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@sagarsprings.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID ajai.singh@sagarsprings.com
MD Email ID sagar@sagarsprings.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
4080
0
0
2000
0
6080
Check Qty
4080
0
0
2000
0
6080
NG Qty
2
0
0
0
0
2
 
Scrap 2
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% inspection check ETL Halol plant
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
coiling. tempring ,grinding, shot peening, 2nd tempring, scragging, checking &correction, powdercoating
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Powder coating
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Powder coating
Machine / Cell No. Powder coating
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MaterialDeffective powder not get stick properlyPowder get well stick with spring, check spring after coatingO
ManPainter intervention in spring path after coatingBarricade is presence and except painter no body is entering in booth while coatingO
MethodSpring not hange properlySpring hanged are incorrect postion and inclination observedX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size NO
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Powder coating not ok
Why 2 The spring had collapsed from the wall of the booth or oven
Why 3 Due to Some hooks were not strong enough to hold the spring
Why 4 Due to excessive use of hooks
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Due to excessive use of hooks hence spring had collapsed from the wall of the booth or oven.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Powder coating not ok spring move to customer end.
Why 2 Not ok part put with ok part on final inspection table.
Why 3 Due to rejection bin away from the table.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Not ok part put with ok part on final inspection table by final inspector.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowOn job training given to inspector for the same.RGM / HKR - QA17/05/202417/05/2024Completed
OccuranceThe frequency for using the hook will be determinedsupervisor27/05/202419/05/2024Completed
OutflowClosed mouth rejection bin will be provided on each final inspection table.Supervisor27/05/202419/05/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details Closed mouth rejection bin (Lock & Key) will be provided on each final inspection table.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size NO
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) How often to use the hook was not determined in work instraction
803_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Decided to Use the hook only 3 times only update work instraction.
803_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) open mouth rejection bin away from final inspection table
803_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Closed mouth Rejection bin privided on each final inspection tabel so operater rejected part not mixup with ok part.
803_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant all powder coated springs
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document no
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity
Reason for submission