QFR No - 8000877852
Defect Details
NC No. 8000877852
NC Date 11/06/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F20508502B
Part Name UNDER BKT ASSY MACHINED - XF1C1
Supplier Name & Code 100060-A.G.TRANSMISSIONS
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-THREAD M22 MAJOR DIA UNDERSIZE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description THREAD M22 MAJOR DIA UNDERSIZE
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Safety
NG Quantity 8
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID agtransmissions@rediffmail.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID planthead@agtransmissionsindia.com
MD Email ID agtransmissions@rediffmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
150
0
0
1200
0
1350
Check Qty
150
0
0
1200
0
1350
NG Qty
8
0
0
2
0
10
 
Scrap 10
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% Inspection done & special identification white dot on Shaft done.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Forging & pipe Inward, Drilling, Semi Boring, M8 Drilling, Slitting, Bracket Visual Inspection, Pipe Cutting, Flaring, Center Facing, CNC Turning, Visual Inspection, Pressing, Welding, M8 Tapping, Fine Boring, M6 Tapping, Deburring, Back Chamfer, Air Cleaning, Parallelity Inspection, Final Inspection, Packing & Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation CNC Turning
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC
Machine / Cell No. CNC
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineWrong Offset givenProgram lock not providedX
MethodSampling inspection done100 Nos checkedX
ManUnskilled opratorAs per skill matrix Operator in skilledO
ToolTool Change frequency not Followed.Tool change frequency followed. OKO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 M22 Thread undersize
Why 2 Wrong offset given for M22 Thread Dia.
Why 3 Program lock was not present
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Program lock was not provided
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 M22 Thread undersize
Why 2 Not detected at Final Inspection
Why 3 Sampling Inspection done. 10 Per Lot
Why 4 As per control Plan frequency
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Lack of 100% inspection
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceProgram lock providedSupervisor27/06/202427/06/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Instead of sampling inspection. 100% Inspection by Thread Ring Gauge M22-6g is started.
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Program lock was not present
852_Occurance_Before.jpeg
Occurance (After) Program lock provided
852_Occurance_After.jpeg
Outflow (Before) Sampling Inspection
852_Outflow_Before.xls
Outflow (After) 100% Inspection started
852_Outflow_After.xls
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Caliber Under Bracket
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document PDIR
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 150
Reason for submission OK