QFR No - 8000879354
Defect Details
NC No. 8000879354
NC Date 22/06/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2LG05402B
Part Name SEAT PIPE - J1A & J1D
Supplier Name & Code 101222-SANGKAJ ENGINEERING PVT LTD- U
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-MIX-UP
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Mix-up
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 5
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID aslam@sangkaj.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID pardeshinr@snagkaj.com
MD Email ID anirudh.2007@hotmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
1000
0
0
1000
0
2000
Check Qty
1000
0
0
1000
0
2000
NG Qty
5
0
0
0
0
5
 
Scrap 5
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Segregation of Pipeline material, Customer end, WIP, Supplier end.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
10.RM Inspection; 20.Parting off and chamfering; 30.Weighing and moly powder application; 40.Draw forging; 50.Head Forging; 60.Rough Grinding; 70A. Collar Machining; 70B. Total length facing, Drilling & Tapping; 80.Hole piercing; 90 DF and Compression hole chamfering; 100.ID Cleaning & Deburring; 110.Finish Grinding; 120.Ultrasonic Cleaning; 130. Final Inspection; 140.Oiling; 150.Packing and storage.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation 140.Final Inspection
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Final Inspection table
Machine / Cell No. FID-SP-01
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManUnskilled operator/InspectorFound skilled operatorO
ToolWrong tool usedOK tool usedO
MethodMethod of handling of rework and rejection Not okRework method not described properlyX
MaterialWrong Input materialMaterial found OKO
MachineNO input and output stage defined at Machine stageInput and Output foundO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Seat pipe model mix up.
Why 2 Rework of J1A and J1D at FID kept in same bin.
Why 3 Parameters are same in J1A and J1D of rework
Why 4 In rework handling procedure modelwise seperate rework not defined.
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) In rework handling procedure modelwise seperate rework not defined.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Model mix up of seat pipe J1A and J1D found at customer end.
Why 2 Mix up of J1A and J1D seat pipe not detected at FID.
Why 3 After rework of material only rework parameter verified
Why 4 After rework mix up parameter not verified.
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) After rework mix up parameter not verified.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowChanges in rework handling procedure for repeat Final inspection for all parameters after rework done.Mr.Irfan01/07/202401/07/2024Completed
OccuranceChanges in rework handling procedure for keeping material modelwise and rework parameter wise seperate.Mr.Irfan01/07/202401/07/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Inspection from initial stage after rework of parts.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) No instructions on Modelwise seperate before rework in SOP.
882_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) Seperate material before rework modelwise Instruction added in SOP.
882_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) NO reverification from initial stage of rework material on final inspection.
882_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Instruction added in rework SOP for reinspection of all material from initial stage on Final inspection.
882_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Not applicable
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document NO other document
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 100
Reason for submission OK