QFR No - 8000880715
Defect Details
NC No. 8000880715
NC Date 02/07/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 550FA19533
Part Name FORK PIPE MACHINED K8
Supplier Name & Code 101222-SANGKAJ ENGINEERING PVT LTD- U
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-SHORT LENGTH
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description SHORT LENGTH
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 26
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID aslam@sangkaj.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID pardenshinr@sangkaj.com
MD Email ID anirudh.2007@hotmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2000
0
0
100
0
2100
Check Qty
2000
0
0
100
0
2100
NG Qty
26
0
0
0
0
26
 
Scrap 26
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Segregation done at ETL-K228, and also at M/S Sangkaj engineering.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Tube Inward - Induction hardening - CNC1st - CNC 2nd - Drilling - Visual inspection - bundling - Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation CNC 2nd setup
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC machine
Machine / Cell No. CNC machine
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodLoading of component not as per defined methodComponent loading as per specified methodX
MaterialRework material , mixed up with ok materialSeparate bins are provided for R/W and OK materialX
MachineStopper can be looseStopper observed loose during running the machineO
ManOperator not followed Inspection sequenceProgram is provided to control the operation sequence.X
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection No
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 500:10
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Machine stopper nut position shifted.
Why 2 Stopper provided nut observed loose.
Why 3 Nut couldn`t sustain the load during running the machine.
Why 4 Single nut is provided to the stopper.
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Single Nut provided to the stopper.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Total length observed oversize.
Why 2 Not detected into the final inspection
Why 3 Checking frequency got less. (500:10)
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Checking frequency got less. (500:10)
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceOPL is provided on machine.Mr Krushna Phuke24/07/202402/07/2024Completed
OutflowInspection frequency increased by 500:20Mr Amol Tali24/07/202402/07/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Checking frequency is increased by 500:20
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 500:20
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Single Nut provided to stopper
898_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Double Nut provided to stopper.
898_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Checking frequency got less
898_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Checking Frequency increased
898_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Same department/ Machine Cell
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan
Specify Other Document OPL
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity
Reason for submission