QFR No - 8000881730
Defect Details
NC No. 8000881730
NC Date 08/07/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F20519007B
Part Name UNDER BRACKET ASSEMBLY H107B PHASE 1
Supplier Name & Code 100073-SINGLA FORGING (P) LTD
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details THREADING NOT OK-Step observed
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description THREADING NOT OK-Step observed
Detection Stage Customer End
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 5
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@singlaforging.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID quality@singlaforging.in
MD Email ID jain@singlaforging.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
100
500
0
0
0
600
Check Qty
100
500
0
0
0
600
NG Qty
70
370
0
0
0
440
 
Scrap 0
Rework 440
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100% THREADING DIE ANSWER IN THE THREAD TILL THE GROOVE END ,WHICH AVAILABLE BELOW THE THREAD
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
STEERING SHAFT PFD:- 10-RECEIPT OF MATERIAL 20-RECEIPT INSPECTION , 30-STORAGE , 40-DMC OPERATION, 50-CNC TURNING 1ST ,60-BUSH PRESSING, 70-HOLE BUSH WELDING, 80-CNC TURNING 2ND , 90-CNC TURNING 3RD, 100-CNC TURNING 4TH
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation 100-CNC TURNING
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC TURNING
Machine / Cell No. CNC
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManUnskilled operator.inspectorskill matrixO
Machinewrong correction in machine eprogramthraed length 21.5 is mention in the machjine program and drawing requirement 21.5-1.0 mmO
MethodLimitation of drawingduring verification of the drawing ,it observed that groove dia is more than the thread minor diaX
MachineIncomplete operationProgram completion logic is available at machine as part will not de-clamp without complete of operaO
Machinewrong offsetoffset value locked in 0.005mmO
Methodinspection frequecy not followed100% inspection done by TRGO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Matting part mot answering on the thread till the groove end
Why 2 Groove diameter is more than the thread minor diameter
Why 3 Specification given as per the drawing
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Groove diameter is more by the thread minor diameter by which matting part not answering till groove end
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Part not detected in the final inspection stage
Why 2 TRG gauge answering till the thread end.
Why 3
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) NO
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceCustomer drawing need to revise either for thread length or for the groove depth.ETL10/08/2024Inprocess
OccuranceThread length raised by the 1mm in the machine program by which minor diameter profile machined in the groove & gauge or matting part answer till the groove end. effective date 25.06.2024QA01/08/202401/08/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details No change point
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Machine program in which thread length was 21.5mm
925_Occurance_Before.jpeg
Occurance (After) Machine program in which thread length is 22.5mm,which is out of the drawing but meeting the customer requirement.
925_Occurance_After.jpeg
Outflow (Before) TRG
925_Outflow_Before.jpeg
Outflow (After) TRG
925_Outflow_After.jpeg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant NO
 
12. Document Review
Documents Drawing, ControlPlan
Specify Other Document Need revise Cust Drg
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity
Reason for submission