QFR No - 8000882628
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000882628 |
NC Date | 15/07/2024 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | F2FA11933B |
Part Name | FORK PIPE MACHINED - J1D |
Supplier Name & Code | 101030-TUBE INVESTMENTS OF INDIA LTD |
ETL Plant | 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension |
Defect Details | NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-THREADING NG |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | THREADING NG |
Detection Stage | Inprocess |
Problem Severity | Fitment |
NG Quantity | 11 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | AmitVD@tii.murugappa.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | guptaajay@tii.murugappa.com |
MD Email ID | mukeshahuja@tii.murugappa.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
400
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
400
|
Check Qty |
400
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
400
|
NG Qty |
11
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
Scrap | 11 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
All Stock available at ETL end & Inhouse checked for the Threading Parameter |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
Raw Material Inspection- Machining (Cualking & Threading)-Drilling-Oiling-Final Inspection-Dispatch |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | Machining |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | CNC Machine Cell |
Machine / Cell No. | Machine No: 22 & 23 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Method | No step wise offset given & verified it`s impact to achieve the product characteristics | Wrong off set at time of set up | X |
Method | Inspection on a sampling basis | Inspection on a sampling basis which is not adequate for detection | X |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 13 Nos/500 |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Threading NG - Threading Minor Dia observed under size. |
Why 2 | Excess Material removal during machining Cut for threading Minor Dia |
Why 3 | During the Machining setup geometric parameter setting not proper |
Why 4 | The wrong offset value was put during the setup. |
Why 5 | The CNC Program did not have Offest value interlocking to give threading offset. & hence offset could be given from 10 microns to 0.2 mm. |
Root Cause (Occurance) | The CNC Program did not have Offest value interlocking to give threading offset. & hence offset could be given from 10 microns to 0.2 mm. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Not detected during the final inspection |
Why 2 | Inspection on a sampling basis which is not adequate for detection |
Why 3 | |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Inspection on a sampling basis which is not adequate for detection |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | Threading Offset Value has been locked in the CNC Program for 50 microns so that more than 50 micron offset cannot be given. | Mr. Rathod KS | 16/07/2024 | 16/07/2024 | Completed |
Outflow | Sampling Inspection Qty. Doubled from 13 Nos/500 Nos. . to 26 Nos./500 Nos. | Mr. Dethe SS | 16/07/2024 | 16/07/2024 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | Sampling Inspection Qty. Doubled from 13 Nos/500 Nos. to 26 Nos./500 Nos. |
Inspection Method | Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 26/500 Nos |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Before: The CNC Program did not have Offset value interlocking to give threading offset. & hence offset could be given from 10 microns to 0.2 mm. 940_Occurance_Before.pdf |
Occurance (After) |
After: Threading Offset Value has been locked in the CNC Program for 50 microns so that more than 50-micron offset cannot be given. 940_Occurance_After.pdf |
Outflow (Before) |
Sampling Inspection Qty. 13 Nos/500 Nos. Not Adhequete 940_Outflow_Before.pdf |
Outflow (After) |
Sampling Inspection Qty. Doubled from 13 Nos/500 Nos. . to 26 Nos./500 Nos 940_Outflow_After.pdf |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | All Models |
12. Document Review
Documents | WISOP, InspCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | WI |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 214 |
Reason for submission | OK |