QFR No - 8000882706
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000882706 |
NC Date | 17/07/2024 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | F2DZ04512B |
Part Name | SCREW CAP/FORK BOLT ABWA ADJUSTABLE |
Supplier Name & Code | 100106-SHARP ENGINEERS. |
ETL Plant | 1118-ETL E-92,93 Suspension |
Defect Details | DIMETER UNDERSIZE-7+0.1 UINDER SIZE |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | 7+0.1 dimension found under size by up to 0.2 mm |
Detection Stage | Receipt |
Problem Severity | Fitment |
NG Quantity | 118 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | No |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | quality@sharp-engineers.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | kurund.ma@sharp-engineers.com |
MD Email ID | urkhandelwal@sharp-engineers.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
450
|
0
|
0
|
1200
|
0
|
1650
|
Check Qty |
450
|
0
|
0
|
1200
|
0
|
1650
|
NG Qty |
118
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
0
|
146
|
Scrap | 146 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
Pipline material segregated at Customer and our end |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
RM incoming Inspection |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | CNC |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | CNC |
Machine / Cell No. | CNC |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Tool | Insert broken | No insert broken | O |
Method | Fixture not clesn properly | Fixture cleaned after every cycle regardi ng Work Instruction also displayed at Machine stage | O |
Man | New manpower | Manpower available as per skill matrix | O |
Man | Unskill operator | Skill operator available | O |
Man | Wrong setting done by operator | Setting done ok, also Setup approval report evident | O |
Machine | power cut | no power cut | O |
Tool | Insert wear out | No insert wear out | O |
Method | Insert not change at defined frequency | As per tool history card its obeserved tool changed at defined frequency | O |
Method | Part not validated after replacement of insert | Part not validated after replacement of insert | X |
Tool | Tool Change | No any tool changed | O |
Material | RM change | RM found as pr requirement | O |
Machine | Machine changed | No machine change | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Instrument |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | No |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 5 nos |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Dimension 7 undersized |
Why 2 | Dimension 7 +0.2/+0.1 observed 6.95 |
Why 3 | Insert changed |
Why 4 | Insert life over |
Why 5 | verification not done after replacement of insert coz dependency on operator. |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Part not validated after replacement of insert by operator |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Dimension 7 undersized |
Why 2 | Skip from inspection |
Why 3 | No checkpoint at final inspection |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | No checkpoint at final inspection |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outflow | Checkpoint added in Final inspection and verification started at PDI stage | Omkar Bhange | 31/07/2024 | 31/07/2024 | Completed |
Outflow | Part verification started by Supervisor and Inprocess engineer after replacement of Insert. | Ingole and Yogesh chavan | 30/07/2024 | 31/07/2024 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | Verification started by Supervisor and Inprocess engineer |
Inspection Method | Instrument |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 5 |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Operator dependency for part verification after replacement of insert 944_Occurance_Before.jpg |
Occurance (After) |
On job training given to Production supervisor and Inprocess engineer for verification of part after replacement of insert 944_Occurance_After.jpeg |
Outflow (Before) |
No check point in final inspection 944_Outflow_Before.jpg |
Outflow (After) |
Check point added in Final inspection also verification point added in PDI report 944_Outflow_After.jpg |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | For all machine |
12. Document Review
Documents | ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP, InspCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | NA |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 500 |
Reason for submission | after correction issue not observed. |